uniform
!!!
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2006
- Messages
- 47
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2007
Questions about First Year Chemistry subjects, please help!
Hi everyone,
i know my questions have been touched on in other threads as i've searched through, but the answers haven't been all that clear, well, for me, so please bear with me!
I'm thinking of doing BSc (Nutrition) next year, but I didn't do HSC chemistry and it is a requirement of first year that i take chem subjects (though it does not specify which units i must take, i.e. fundamentals 1001 or normal 1101 etc). I did the preliminary course in chem in year 11, however.
The thing is, that I am confused about first year chemistry:
- If CHEM1001/1002 fundamentals is completely introductory with no assumed knowledge, right from the basics as they suggest, for those without any HSC chem knowledge, why is it then 'strongly recommended' that i take a bridging course? I mean, i'll take one if I really need to, i'm just confused by the, uhh, i guess, paradox they put forward. (If i DO end up taking the bridging course, does that mean I am then qualified to do normal CHEM1101 instead of fundamentals?)
- Is CHEM1001/1002, then, sufficient for second year subjects such as biochemistry (a requisite major for Nutrition) - i'm not too familiar with biochemistry - is it more closely aligned to the biological sciences than to chemistry?, i.e., is it as technical as pure chemistry or more, uhh, 'descriptive' like biology?
- If fundamental units aren't sufficient, are normal chem units (1101/1102) way out of the question for me, with only prelim chem? Do they not revise from the beginning (obviously at a fast pace though)?
THANKYOU SO MUCH! I'd really appreciate answers! Preferably before UAC change of preferences close.
Hi everyone,
i know my questions have been touched on in other threads as i've searched through, but the answers haven't been all that clear, well, for me, so please bear with me!
I'm thinking of doing BSc (Nutrition) next year, but I didn't do HSC chemistry and it is a requirement of first year that i take chem subjects (though it does not specify which units i must take, i.e. fundamentals 1001 or normal 1101 etc). I did the preliminary course in chem in year 11, however.
The thing is, that I am confused about first year chemistry:
- If CHEM1001/1002 fundamentals is completely introductory with no assumed knowledge, right from the basics as they suggest, for those without any HSC chem knowledge, why is it then 'strongly recommended' that i take a bridging course? I mean, i'll take one if I really need to, i'm just confused by the, uhh, i guess, paradox they put forward. (If i DO end up taking the bridging course, does that mean I am then qualified to do normal CHEM1101 instead of fundamentals?)
- Is CHEM1001/1002, then, sufficient for second year subjects such as biochemistry (a requisite major for Nutrition) - i'm not too familiar with biochemistry - is it more closely aligned to the biological sciences than to chemistry?, i.e., is it as technical as pure chemistry or more, uhh, 'descriptive' like biology?
- If fundamental units aren't sufficient, are normal chem units (1101/1102) way out of the question for me, with only prelim chem? Do they not revise from the beginning (obviously at a fast pace though)?
THANKYOU SO MUCH! I'd really appreciate answers! Preferably before UAC change of preferences close.
Last edited: