wow, thats reliable...Originally posted by ND
Maybe BlackJack or spice girl could tell us what they think they got? (even though they got mid band 6's).
Heheh, you can usually tell (well i can tell you alomst exactly what i got in any maths exam), but i suppose with those bullshit answers in the new chem and phys, you can never really be certain.Originally posted by freaking_out
wow, thats reliable...
true, coz maths is a different stroy altogether....Originally posted by ND
Heheh, you can usually tell (well i can tell you alomst exactly what i got in any maths exam), but i suppose with those bullshit answers in the new chem and phys, you can never really be certain.
there u have it, if laz doesn't know, then how do u expect us 2 know?Originally posted by Dave85
i thought the aligning was pretty good in physics/chem so i thought maybe 85 may be nearly a 90...
LOL... na I think it would be around the 85 mark for a band 6....Originally posted by freaking_out
there u have it, if laz doesn't know, then how do u expect us 2 know?
who cares what u think?Originally posted by Dash
LOL... na I think it would be around the 85 mark for a band 6....
Apparently not you!Originally posted by freaking_out
who cares what u think?
Originally posted by Lazarus
No-one really has any idea whether the aligning is 'good' or 'bad'.
See this flowchart: http://www.users.on.net/unix/hscprocess.jpgOriginally posted by Nezz
I know this has probs been asked a hundred times before, but what is the difference between aligned and scaled marks???
OMG.. that is so low.. 81 to get band 6... that seems quite easy.Originally posted by snow bum
Chemistry last year was 81 (83 the year before apparently), Physics is similar I am told.