Not-That-Bright
Andrew Quah
Don't believe the experiements you're doing, don't believe the research you're readingkatie_tully said:Don't believe me? As in what sense?
Don't believe the experiements you're doing, don't believe the research you're readingkatie_tully said:Don't believe me? As in what sense?
which irritates the crap out of me considering the only reason why they wouldn't believe is because its fucking up with their beliefs and have a very intolerant and narrow mindset. I say this considering there are Christians who are incredibly open and accepting with science.Not-That-Bright said:Don't believe the experiements you're doing, don't believe the research you're reading
i dont think Israel existed before the crusades.withoutaface said:You're forgetting the bloody war where the Muslims took Israel in the first place.
Um Natural? Even if it is natural, how is natural somehow better? Sounds to me like a buzzword.Religion on the other hand has been natural not affecting the natural way of life.
it was created through science, and has resulted in millions of death. SCience has led to industrialisation, leading to pollution. IT was science that blew up hiroshima, if it hadnt been discovered, the japs wouldnt have died, and the number of cancer cases would have reduced. science has led to the destruction of people.Not-That-Bright said:Wow - super.
Science didn't blow up hiroshima, a thing that was created through scientific discoveries and dropped by the united states of america did it... just as science provided you your computer and your koran and well everything man-made... Science and scientific method does not actually do anything, it's just a way of discovering things about the world.
Um Natural? Even if it is natural, how is natural somehow better? Sounds to me like a buzzword.
Science has also done many great things - are you advocating we return to the time when we were essentially monkeys and had nothing? I actually can't imagine humans without scientific advancement, we'd be extinct - maybe that's what you mean when you say science has altered the natural cycle of life, that humans should all be dead?it was created through science, and has resulted in millions of death. SCience has led to industrialisation, leading to pollution. IT was science that blew up hiroshima, if it hadnt been discovered, the japs wouldnt have died, and the number of cancer cases would have reduced. science has led to the destruction of people.
Science will make us extinct very soon. Our sources of food, energy are depeleting rapidly. IF it had not been for science, the human species would exist for longer period of time.Not-That-Bright said:Science has also done many great things - are you advocating we return to the time when we were essentially monkeys and had nothing? I actually can't imagine humans without scientific advancement, we'd be extinct - maybe that's what you mean when you say science has altered the natural cycle of life, that humans should all be dead?
Doubtful.Science will make us extinct very soon. Our sources of food, energy are depeleting rapidly. IF it had not been for science, the human species would exist for longer period of time.
Science has been utilised by humans to do such things.science has led to destruction of the earth, overpopulation, pollution etc. Will lead to the human race to be extinct.
How would humans hunt? How would we deal with disease? (the plague in europe, how would have we delt with that without science?) How would we keep ourselves warm?I dont know how u claim that humans would be extinct if it not were for science, quite the opposite really.
humans have hunted for ages thousand of years, just look at the ancient egyptians, greeks etc. Warm, how do the animals stay warm? Deal with diseases, its natural factor, the plague was only in europe , such controls are necessary for balance.Not-That-Bright said:Doubtful.
Science has been utilised by humans to do such things.
How would humans hunt? How would we deal with disease? (the plague in europe, how would have we delt with that without science?) How would we keep ourselves warm?
do you know what science actually means?HotShot said:it was created through science, and has resulted in millions of death. SCience has led to industrialisation, leading to pollution. IT was science that blew up hiroshima, if it hadnt been discovered, the japs wouldnt have died, and the number of cancer cases would have reduced. science has led to the destruction of people.
i agree that everything in this world is natural, perhaps a better statement. Science has altered the natural cycle of life.
I think this is more closely related to the theory of 'natural selection' and 'survival of the fittest' than compared with religion.HotShot said:humans have hunted for ages thousand of years, just look at the ancient egyptians, greeks etc. Warm, how do the animals stay warm? Deal with diseases, its natural factor, the plague was only in europe , such controls are necessary for balance.
u didnt answer my question.katie_tully said:I accept that science has saved more lives than religion. Science does not kill for the purpose of glory.
i cant the read book, where do i get it from?katie_tully said:I did answer your question. Science has killed nowhere near as many people as religion has. You're a damn fool if you believe that. Like I said, read the book.