MedVision ad

Rudd will lose this election (3 Viewers)

R

Reece92

New Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2009
Messages
17
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
So many bad policies.
China-like internet filter for one.
Think i saw a thread on here saying communist countires seem to have internet filters. Its fine if the filter only gets rid of sick freak pedo sites, but normal sites like google....please don't ban google like china...
 
Lentern

Lentern

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
4,980
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
zombie omie jay said:
polls suggest
otherwise
Click to expand...
Find me an election year since 1987 that did not see the leader of the opposition take the lead at some point? Tony Abbott is not an electable, or as Greg Sheridan would say "usable" leader. Yes Rudd campaigning poorly. Yes, he is still running the campaign you run when you're an opposition leader and the government of the day is old and stale. But the alternative is a polarizing figure, he does not exert the safeness of a Hockey or a Turnbull and as such he'll need an extremely unpopular government to come close to ever winning an election.

Now that Rudd is no longer this bright new thing he needs to create some actual positives about his leadership instead of absence of negatives, which is generally more important but not enough in itself once you've been around a little while. But this government is not yet three years old and Tony Abbott did himself too much damage as a minister of the Howard government. I'm starting to come round to the view that if Rudd wins this election he will not make it to the one after but I maintain the only chance of a liberal victory at this election was Turnbull in full swing and that ain't Tony Abbott in any sense.
 
slugboy

slugboy

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2010
Messages
153
Location
In your mums house. Ill be waiting for you.
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
Reece92 said:
So many bad policies.
China-like internet filter for one.
Think i saw a thread on here saying communist countires seem to have internet filters. Its fine if the filter only gets rid of sick freak pedo sites, but normal sites like google....please don't ban google like china...
Click to expand...
they ain't gonna ban google, they're only gonna censor certain search results e.g. Google censored the EncyclopediaDramatica article on Aboriginals from search results, because it is extremely racist
 
Lauchlan

Lauchlan

Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2010
Messages
671
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
JKhoury said:
When did it become the responsibility of the government to censor what I see in the first place?
Click to expand...
censorship has happened many times before eg. during war.

this isnt censorship - everyone is blowing this out of proportion and it probaly wont even get passed in the senate anyways.
 
murphyad

murphyad

Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2008
Messages
416
Location
Newy, brah!
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Lauchlan said:
censorship has happened many times before eg. during war.

this isnt censorship - everyone is blowing this out of proportion and it probaly wont even get passed in the senate anyways.
Click to expand...
Of course it is fucking censorship.

Censorship (from Apple Mac Dictionary): noun
the practice of officially examining books, movies, etc., and suppressing 'unacceptable' parts

That is what is happening.

That is censorship.

And who gives a damn if it has happened in the past - it shouldn't be happening in the present. War happened in the past. Genocide happened in the past. And I suppose you would feel perfectly OK in justifying a whole ton of other abhorrent practices simply because other people did them first?
 
Lauchlan

Lauchlan

Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2010
Messages
671
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
murphyad said:
Of course it is fucking censorship.

Censorship (from Apple Mac Dictionary): noun
the practice of officially examining books, movies, etc., and suppressing 'unacceptable' parts

That is what is happening.

That is censorship.

And who gives a damn if it has happened in the past - it shouldn't be happening in the present. War happened in the past. Genocide happened in the past. And I suppose you would feel perfectly OK in justifying a whole ton of other abhorrent practices simply because other people did them first?
Click to expand...
it is censorship (in a sense) but not the bad censorship your talking about.

im not backing it (because i havent seen the details) but i think it aims to get rid of overseas websites with child porn in them ect.

i was answering the question "since when have govts been able to censor stuff".

geez - calm down and stop assuming the worst with your giant stereotypes ie. liberals.
 
murphyad

murphyad

Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2008
Messages
416
Location
Newy, brah!
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Lauchlan said:
it is censorship (in a sense) but not the bad censorship your talking about.

im not backing it (because i havent seen the details) but i think it aims to get rid of overseas websites with child porn in them ect.
Click to expand...
It will also block a whole lot of other stuff as well, like /b/. And I like /b/.
 
J

Jazuzi

Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2010
Messages
99
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Lauchlan said:
it is censorship (in a sense) but not the bad censorship your talking about.

im not backing it (because i havent seen the details) but i think it aims to get rid of overseas websites with child porn in them ect.

i was answering the question "since when have govts been able to censor stuff".

geez - calm down and stop assuming the worst with your giant stereotypes ie. liberals.
Click to expand...

show me some child porn websites please.
 
scuba_steve2121

scuba_steve2121

On The Road To Serfdom
Joined
Dec 2, 2009
Messages
1,343
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Jazuzi said:
I'm pretty sure this has been pointed out a few times to this Lauchlan fella.
Click to expand...
he has been known to reject facts when they are thrown in his face and pass them off as opinions. oh well life goes on, for everyone else at least
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 3)

Top