I replied earlier.AWrules said:runnable why u so belligerent?
where did u get that definition from?
Yep. Tim Dixon's book (i just realised its him)
Pg 174 middle of page, Read up on rising participation rates
then
pg 171, on NAIRU.
I replied earlier.AWrules said:runnable why u so belligerent?
where did u get that definition from?
A is wrong.. you can hardly say a characteristic of developing countries is low income inequality. High more like it. B is wrong for obvious reasons. C is wrong for also obvious reasons. Therefore 1 is D.Q2C-ME said:idiots...
somebody justify D then...justify agricultural production
middle east e.t.c,
that doesnt defeat inequaility...nor does it raise agricultural :Slolcal said:Developing Economy: Country with low economic development with relatively low standard of living. Has undeveloped industrial base and low GDP per capita.
You can keep convincing yaself it's A ya ongkgrah but 7 was C!runnable said:Sry I think you didnt get all right. Cuz 7=A. No mention of inflation whatsoever in the question, so not sure why you brought in the philips curve.
it doesnt mention inflation but the answers state increase in prices which = inflation...Davadale said:You can keep convincing yaself it's A ya ongkgrah but 7 was C!
i agreeeeeeee wit u11Q2C-ME said:okay...guys ill admit im wrong...ill get 18/20 probally 19...
but honestly didnt any1 think its so generic...likee so much discreprentiyyy
fuckk...all thoose oil selling developing countries...and like latin america has no agricultural e.t.c
i hate how the fuckin stuipd things fuck me up...but i get what every1 thinks is hard.... 7 is soooo C...and its sooooooo obvious in the key words "inital" and runnable dont past your wholeee hidden e.t.c shit.....GO TO GOOGLE AND TYPE IN THE FOLLOWING "AUGMENTED LONG RUN PHILLPS CURVE"
its in the texts cambridge and leading edge
grrr...i hate how i get that but not the simple shit
Yeah because alignmentwise, 70 is a below average mark, which gives you a below average UAI (50).jacobkhoury said:Do you guys reakon that "sam" is a good calculation of the UAI?
I put 70 for every subject and it gave me a 50UAI
Thats not possible?
The question was wat the impact looked like, not wat the initial change looked like.jasonml said:How could it be a quota? A quote on that graph would create a vertical line (on or to the right of equilibrium).