Silver Persian
Banned
Say it a couple of days ago. Ending v. much annoyed me. MR BIG IS AN ARSE AND WILL CONTINUALLY FUCK YOU OVER CARRIE GET IT INTO YOUR UNSEXY HORSE FACE :angry:
-
Finished your HSC? Check out our University Discussion, Non-School forums or help out next year's HSC students! -
YOU can help the next generation of students in the community! Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
Sex And The City Movie (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter eroticajones
- Start date
s-p-a-c-e-d
Active Member
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2006
- Messages
- 1,057
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2006
i laughed sooo much when Charlotte hit Big with that bunch of flowers and screamed 'NO!', she overacted a lot...
lol, chick flick to the max
lol, chick flick to the max
The_highwayman
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2004
- Messages
- 4,317
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2005
Re: SEX and the city sluts?or romantically challenged?
she looked good in the vogue shoot scenes too.
she looked pretty good at the wedding. the mole on her chin wasnt nearly as noticeable.em_516 said:
she looked good in the vogue shoot scenes too.
gouge.away
MonCœurS'ouvre à taVoix
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2007
- Messages
- 415
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- N/A
Re: SEX and the city sluts?or romantically challenged?
who cares about her physical appearance... it's the clothes. THE CLOTHES. nevermind the woman looks like a streak of well-coiffed pelican shit IT'S THE FUCKING ARTFULLY CUT PIECES OF SWEATSHOP FABRIC HANGING OF HER CADAVEROUS FRAME.Silver Persian said:
Dramaqueen06
Member
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2007
- Messages
- 73
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2008
Absolutley Love It!!!
Can only find this from gossip sources, but SJP had that fuck-off mole removed. About.Freaking.Time. Surely she should've done that before the movie/the entire tv series? Anyway, dunno if it's legit but it looks pretty gone.
http://thesuperficial.com/2008/07/sarah_jessica_parker_had_her_m.php
Before and after
http://thesuperficial.com/2008/07/sarah_jessica_parker_had_her_m.php
Before and after
blue_chameleon
Shake the sauce bottle yo
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2003
- Messages
- 3,078
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2003
Still looks like a witch.em_516 said:
blue_chameleon
Shake the sauce bottle yo
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2003
- Messages
- 3,078
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2003
Paper bag it?em_516 said:
citizentruth
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2008
- Messages
- 1
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- 2012
Re: SEX and the CITY!!
<center>RE-POST! RE-POST! RE-POST!</CENTER>
Will candidate John McCain keep child predators out of our country?
you be the judge.
surely, Sen. John McCain has painted himself as "Tough On Immigration" but what do the facts say about him when you do the research on his voting record?
On 06/06/2007 McCain voted "NO" on passing an amendment that would:
" prohibit undocumented immigrants convicted of aggravated felonies, domestic violence, stalking, violation of protection orders,CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN, or crimes relating to the illegal purchase or sale of firearms, from gaining legal status."
c'mon john, can't we at least keep the child molesters out of our country?
but that's not all;
Far from his supposed support of American patriotism, he wouldn't even vote yes to declare English as our common language, when he voted "NO" to an amendment entitled "To preserve and enhance the role of the English language." But prehaps it was the wording that confused him; here's the synopsis of that amendment:
" a vote to adopt an amendment that declares English to be the common language of the United States."
I mean you wouldn't think we'd even need a vote on that, but who knows?
Maybe Johnny boy is just confused in general, here's an excerpt from an interview he did with Bill O'Reiley back in May 31 of 2007:
O'REILLY:"--they want to bring in millions of foreign nationals to basically breakdown the structure that we have. In that regard, Pat Buchanan is right. So I say that you've got to cap it with a number."
MCCAIN: "In America today, we have a very strong economy, low unemployment. So we need additional farm workers, including by the way, agriculture."
This bizarre response from McCain comes back in 2007, when we had a strong economy right? I mean it's not like gas prices were skyrocketing along with unemployment or home foreclosures, last year right?
But lets get back to his voting record, I mean we already know you can't trust what he <i>says</i>, he's a politician after all!
What about voting on another bill in 2007 to reduce the number of foreign nationals working here in the United States? How did our Senator from Arizona vote on that?
He didn't.
Apparently he either didn't show up to work that day, or he just did not feel it was important enough to vote on. After all, as he said to O'Reilly, "--we have a very strong economy, low unemployment. So we need additional farm workers--"
Hey, I don't know about you but I think alot of folks who lost their farms to foreclosure last year as a direct result of fuel prices and legal actions by the Monsanto Corporation might have something to say about that statement!
But surely he supported spending billions of tax dollars to create that stronger border fence with mexico right? Well... not so much at first.
McCAin voted "NO" on a bill "To appropriate an additional $1,829,400,000 to construct double-layered fencing and vehicle barriers along the southwest border"
but perhaps it just didn't include enough pork-barrel spending for him, he later flip-flopped on his decision when they took out the bit about "reduces discretionary funds in the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations on a pro rata basis by $1.83 billion" which would have neatly paid for the border fence by cutting homeland security's ability to spend $1.83 billion <i>on whatever the hell they want</i> Seems we don't need to have any control over what homeland security decides to waste our money on, thank you very much!
But maybe we're being to hard on the guy. Surely he's got strong views on immigration, he just doesn't always remeber to vote the right way.
Here's a quick run down of his views on immigration, and all other issues as stated by himself in an Issue Positions Test of 2004: (sorry, he has refused to participate in the 2008 version, I wonder why?):
http://votesmart.org/npat.php?can_id=53270#864
remember, "x" marks the positions he DOES support!
Finally, don't believe everything the media tells you. Do your own research, here are some links to the voting records mentioned here, and the O'Reilly Interview:
http://votesmart.org/issue_keyvote_detail.php?cs_id=V3888&can_id=53270
http://votesmart.org/issue_keyvote_detail.php?cs_id=13888&can_id=53270
http://votesmart.org/issue_keyvote_detail.php?cs_id=13435&can_id=53270
http://votesmart.org/speech_detail.php?sc_id=289197&keyword=&phrase=&contain=
http://votesmart.org/issue_keyvote_detail.php?cs_id=V3888&can_id=53270
http://votesmart.org/speech.php?can_id=53270&around=06/06/2007&type=search#Results
http://votesmart.org/issue_keyvote_detail.php?cs_id=13888&can_id=53270 english as american language
http://votesmart.org/issue_keyvote_detail.php?cs_id=17107&can_id=53270 funding for military intelligence
http://votesmart.org/issue_keyvote_member.php?cs_id=13435 deny immigration to child molestors,
<center>RE-POST! RE-POST! RE-POST!</CENTER>
Will candidate John McCain keep child predators out of our country?
you be the judge.
surely, Sen. John McCain has painted himself as "Tough On Immigration" but what do the facts say about him when you do the research on his voting record?
On 06/06/2007 McCain voted "NO" on passing an amendment that would:
" prohibit undocumented immigrants convicted of aggravated felonies, domestic violence, stalking, violation of protection orders,CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN, or crimes relating to the illegal purchase or sale of firearms, from gaining legal status."
c'mon john, can't we at least keep the child molesters out of our country?
but that's not all;
Far from his supposed support of American patriotism, he wouldn't even vote yes to declare English as our common language, when he voted "NO" to an amendment entitled "To preserve and enhance the role of the English language." But prehaps it was the wording that confused him; here's the synopsis of that amendment:
" a vote to adopt an amendment that declares English to be the common language of the United States."
I mean you wouldn't think we'd even need a vote on that, but who knows?
Maybe Johnny boy is just confused in general, here's an excerpt from an interview he did with Bill O'Reiley back in May 31 of 2007:
O'REILLY:"--they want to bring in millions of foreign nationals to basically breakdown the structure that we have. In that regard, Pat Buchanan is right. So I say that you've got to cap it with a number."
MCCAIN: "In America today, we have a very strong economy, low unemployment. So we need additional farm workers, including by the way, agriculture."
This bizarre response from McCain comes back in 2007, when we had a strong economy right? I mean it's not like gas prices were skyrocketing along with unemployment or home foreclosures, last year right?
But lets get back to his voting record, I mean we already know you can't trust what he <i>says</i>, he's a politician after all!
What about voting on another bill in 2007 to reduce the number of foreign nationals working here in the United States? How did our Senator from Arizona vote on that?
He didn't.
Apparently he either didn't show up to work that day, or he just did not feel it was important enough to vote on. After all, as he said to O'Reilly, "--we have a very strong economy, low unemployment. So we need additional farm workers--"
Hey, I don't know about you but I think alot of folks who lost their farms to foreclosure last year as a direct result of fuel prices and legal actions by the Monsanto Corporation might have something to say about that statement!
But surely he supported spending billions of tax dollars to create that stronger border fence with mexico right? Well... not so much at first.
McCAin voted "NO" on a bill "To appropriate an additional $1,829,400,000 to construct double-layered fencing and vehicle barriers along the southwest border"
but perhaps it just didn't include enough pork-barrel spending for him, he later flip-flopped on his decision when they took out the bit about "reduces discretionary funds in the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations on a pro rata basis by $1.83 billion" which would have neatly paid for the border fence by cutting homeland security's ability to spend $1.83 billion <i>on whatever the hell they want</i> Seems we don't need to have any control over what homeland security decides to waste our money on, thank you very much!
But maybe we're being to hard on the guy. Surely he's got strong views on immigration, he just doesn't always remeber to vote the right way.
Here's a quick run down of his views on immigration, and all other issues as stated by himself in an Issue Positions Test of 2004: (sorry, he has refused to participate in the 2008 version, I wonder why?):
http://votesmart.org/npat.php?can_id=53270#864
remember, "x" marks the positions he DOES support!
Finally, don't believe everything the media tells you. Do your own research, here are some links to the voting records mentioned here, and the O'Reilly Interview:
http://votesmart.org/issue_keyvote_detail.php?cs_id=V3888&can_id=53270
http://votesmart.org/issue_keyvote_detail.php?cs_id=13888&can_id=53270
http://votesmart.org/issue_keyvote_detail.php?cs_id=13435&can_id=53270
http://votesmart.org/speech_detail.php?sc_id=289197&keyword=&phrase=&contain=
http://votesmart.org/issue_keyvote_detail.php?cs_id=V3888&can_id=53270
http://votesmart.org/speech.php?can_id=53270&around=06/06/2007&type=search#Results
http://votesmart.org/issue_keyvote_detail.php?cs_id=13888&can_id=53270 english as american language
http://votesmart.org/issue_keyvote_detail.php?cs_id=17107&can_id=53270 funding for military intelligence
http://votesmart.org/issue_keyvote_member.php?cs_id=13435 deny immigration to child molestors,
hsb39
Member
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2008
- Messages
- 179
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2011
I kind of liked the story bits of the movie, but saw absolutely no reason to the: wow look at this dress! now look at this dress! it is made by [insert company name] buy it! buy it! buy it!
I also thought that the girls in it were kind of in the wrong most of the time.
I'm sorry Carrie (the super witch), but Big didn't do that much wrong and you excluded him for about a year.
I also thought that the girls in it were kind of in the wrong most of the time.
I'm sorry Carrie (the super witch), but Big didn't do that much wrong and you excluded him for about a year.
Ellis Cureton
New Member
Re: SEX and the city sluts?or romantically challenged?
The Fukk is this doing on Bored of Studies? Is there perhaps a "Bored of Slutties" site?
The Fukk is this doing on Bored of Studies? Is there perhaps a "Bored of Slutties" site?