Shm (1 Viewer)

CrashOveride

Active Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2004
Messages
1,488
Location
Havana
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2006
acceleration of a body moving along the x-axis is given by:

d/dx(v^2/2) = -x for x<= 1
d/dx(v^2/2) = 2-x for x > 1

when t=0, x=0 and v=1/3.......determine the extremem points of subsequent motion and hence prove that the motion is SHM

Ok so what i said was: given the conditions its accelerating by way of the 1st case, it cant go anymore than 1/3 because we cant get -ve sqrt and thus will turn back....and by doing so it never exploits the 2nd case. So extreme points are x= +- 1/3.

Now part c) says if that velocity at t=0,x=0 was v=2, find the extreme points of the motion. Explain whether the motion now is SHM or not. I got a bit stuffed up cos i didnt get the extremities in the back of the book and it ends up like crossing into the other acceleration set so that mucks around with it ???
 
Last edited:

CrashOveride

Active Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2004
Messages
1,488
Location
Havana
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2006
Also:

P, Q, R are three points on the x-axis such that PQ = QR = 2m. A particle performs SHM along x-axis and has velocity of 12, 10 and 6 at P , Q, R respectively. Taking the origin at the centre of oscillation, find the constant n in the eqn x'' = -n<sup>2</sup>x
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,640
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Case: At t = 0, v = 1 / 3. Motion governed by d/dx(v<sup>2</sup> / 2) = - x at all times. SHM on -1 / 3 &le; x &le; 1 / 3

Case: At t = 0, v = 2. Motion governed by both cases. Motion is periodic. End points are at x = 4 and x = -2. Motion is not SHM, as not symmetric about x = 1.
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,640
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
CrashOveride said:
Also:

P, Q, R are three points on the x-axis such that PQ = QR = 2m. A particle performs SHM along x-axis and has velocity of 12, 10 and 6 at P , Q, R respectively. Taking the origin at the centre of oscillation, find the constant n in the eqn x'' = -n<sup>2</sup>x
n = &radic;10 / 2
 

CrashOveride

Active Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2004
Messages
1,488
Location
Havana
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2006
You do that off the top of your head? :)

PS. The previous question back of book says extreme points are 2 +- 2sqrt(2)
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,640
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
CrashOveride said:
You do that off the top of your head? :)
No. I showed that P was 17 / 5 units from the origin, that the amplitude of the motion was sqrt(69.16), and hence that n<sup>2</sup> = 5 / 2
PS. The previous question back of book says extreme points are 2 +- 2sqrt(2)
I don't see where I've made a mistake, but I could be wrong. What did you get for the end points?
 

CrashOveride

Active Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2004
Messages
1,488
Location
Havana
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2006
If you dont mind could you post up some working? Because for the P Q R question i wasn;t even sure where to start, i tried doing some things finding expressions for the points as functions of time t and velocities etc. but i couldnt go any further.
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,640
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Since the velocity is higher at P than at R, it follows P is nearer the centre of the motion. So, put P at x = d. It follows that Q is at x = d + 2, and R is at x = d + 4, and you know the velocities at each of these points. We also know that if x'' = -n<sup>2</sup>x, then v<sup>2</sup> = n<sup>2</sup>(A<sup>2</sup> - x<sup>2</sup>), where A is the amplitude.

So, you have three simultaneuos equations in three unknowns A, d and n, to solve for n:

144 = n<sup>2</sup>(A<sup>2</sup> - d<sup>2</sup>)
100 = n<sup>2</sup>[A<sup>2</sup> - (d + 2)<sup>2</sup>]
36 = n<sup>2</sup>[A<sup>2</sup> - (d + 4)<sup>2</sup>]
 

CrashOveride

Active Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2004
Messages
1,488
Location
Havana
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2006
Crikey, didn't even occur to me.

Ah well makes sense now.

For that other question, i got the extremities you got and i said because we have x'' = 0 at x=2, then its not SHM becasue x''=0 only at centre of oscillation.
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,640
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
CrashOveride said:
For that other question, i got the extremities you got and i said because we have x'' = 0 at x=2, then its not SHM becasue x''=0 only at centre of oscillation.
Then maybe the book is wrong? You actually have x'' = 0 at x = 0 as well, another reason it can't be SHM.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top