My point was that it's giving people a bias opinion. I never said it was automatically wrong. BUT you're just looking at data collected by one side of the story. For that same reason if an Islamic institute published the research then of course I'd question its neutrality. Stop being so butthurt when someone questions your point of view.Okay, so what? Does that mean it's automatically wrong? Do you have an actual objection to their methodology or are you just being a shithead?
If an Islamic institute published research that backed up your views, would you take issue with its lack of neutrality? Probably not.
Do you know how opinion polls work?
Do you know what, for example, random sampling means? P-values? Anything?
The results of the polls are the results of the polls. The polls weren't carried out by the website so the website's ideology is irrelevant. Even if the website has an unfair ideological bias, it doesn't change the results of the polls.
Does the fact that he didn't post polls that contradict the findings of the polls on there (if such polls even exist) mean that's he being unfair?
If your narrative were true these polls shouldn't exist.
On top of all this, the website's ideology is relevant. It's because of the websites ideology that it will only provide information which reinforces its case. You're not going to find a pro-communism website advertising the benefits of capitalism. Even though the benefits do exist.