Smh (2 Viewers)

[tacogym27101990]

Exactly. And that is why this issue must also be taken to ACA and TT and other reputable media networks, so that something can be done.

hahaha
yeah ACA and TT are heaps reputable media networks


idiot

 

[WhiteD69]

hahaha
yeah ACA and TT are heaps reputable media networks


idiot

What's that skippy?

 

[tacogym27101990]

oh you were joking before??

thats ok then
i apologise

 

[tommykins]

the retardation of whited69 astounds me.

 

[WhiteD69]

the retardation of whited69 astounds me.

Please, I beg you to show how I am retarded. I genuinely want you to show me exactly what makes you think this.

 

[tacogym27101990]

what do you think?
this extra 15 minutes issue will be negative or beneficial for students who dont go to James Ruse/

idon't think anything is going to come of it
so beneficial for them
although more people will hate them because of it
even though it's not their fault

 

[tacogym27101990]

well there isn't really much they can do
unless they want to send us our tests back and give us an extra 15 minutes on them
which im all for hahaha

 

[tommykins]

Please, I beg you to show how I am retarded. I genuinely want you to show me exactly what makes you think this.

Ok

By comparing their marks to their internal results, and to their results in Ext 2.

The fact that you think you can use internal raw marks to determine the ability of a cohort/individual in relation to the state.

Also, you also seem to think a result in Ext2 is also an indicator. Newflash - some people do better in ext2 then ext1.

yes, and the UAC scaling

Except the cut-off bands aren't based on how everyone goes. The panel of judges pick a cut off band and whoever gets that mark will receive a band 6. Even if it's 60% of students, it won't matter.

Only thing you're correct on is the cohort of James Ruse can effect the UAC scaling, but at an negligible magnitude.

 

[lou071]

Ok


The fact that you think you can use internal raw marks to determine the ability of a cohort/individual in relation to the state.

Also, you also seem to think a result in Ext2 is also an indicator. Newflash - some people do better in ext2 then ext1.


Except the cut-off bands aren't based on how everyone goes. The panel of judges pick a cut off band and whoever gets that mark will receive a band 6. Even if it's 60% of students, it won't matter.

Only thing you're correct on is the cohort of James Ruse can effect the UAC scaling, but at an negligible magnitude.

panel of judges?
how do they judge the cutoff mark for bands?

 

[tommykins]

panel of judges?
how do they judge the cutoff mark for bands?

they're senior markers and they look at the paper.

they then decide on a cut off mark that a band 6,5,4 etc. studnet should get.

collaboration.

 

[lou071]

they're senior markers and they look at the paper.

they then decide on a cut off mark that a band 6,5,4 etc. studnet should get.

collaboration.

do they judge it before the marking begins or after the marking?
if before, what if there are so little people getting top 2 bands?

 

[tommykins]

do they judge it before the marking begins or after the marking?
if before, what if there are so little people getting top 2 bands?

pretty sure it's before.
doesn't matter if theres so little people getting top 2 bands.

 

[lou071]

pretty sure it's before.
doesn't matter if theres so little people getting top 2 bands.

do you think 2008 mathematics ext 1 and ext 2 exams were hard or easy?

 

[tommykins]

average. not too hard not too easy.

 

[gnome8]

Ok


The fact that you think you can use internal raw marks to determine the ability of a cohort/individual in relation to the state.

Also, you also seem to think a result in Ext2 is also an indicator. Newflash - some people do better in ext2 then ext1.


Except the cut-off bands aren't based on how everyone goes. The panel of judges pick a cut off band and whoever gets that mark will receive a band 6. Even if it's 60% of students, it won't matter.

Only thing you're correct on is the cohort of James Ruse can effect the UAC scaling, but at an negligible magnitude.

LOL
Oh dear.

 

[tommykins]

i can't wait to get the result back...
wondering how i went

good luck

 

[lou071]

good luck

do u think u went good?
how did u find chemistry exam? hard or ok or easy?

 

[tommykins]

do u think u went good?
how did u find chemistry exam? hard or ok or easy?

75+/84 for 3unit
80+/120 for 4unit.

chem was easy, hoping a 90+.

 

[lou071]

75+/84 for 3unit
80+/120 for 4unit.

chem was easy, hoping a 90+.

wow... u must be really smart.
do u go to selective high school?

 

[tommykins]

yes