• Want to level up your HSC prep on those harder Maths questions?
    Register now for the BoS Trials (7th October)!

Some Conics Questions (1 Viewer)

DcM

Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2003
Messages
53
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
Originally posted by George W. Bush
CM: Is there a easy way to solve the following question without extensive algebra?

The points P and Q lie on an ellipse (standard eqn). The tangents and P and Q intersect at point T. The midpoint of PQ is the point M. Prove that OM extended (where O is origin) passes through the point T.

the way i wud do it is like this...but that seems such an algebra bash...

find midpt of PQ
find eqn of OM
use chord of contact to find out coordinates of T
sub T into eqn to see if it fits..

this way..u have all the weird algebra or trig..so i dunno if it works cos i didn complete doing it...seems too long...

it wud b nice to have a quicker way.......
well CM?
 

DcM

Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2003
Messages
53
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
when M is midpoint of PQ
does that make angle PMT and QMT = 90 degrees?
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,638
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Originally posted by George W. Bush
CM: Is there a easy way to solve the following question without extensive algebra?

The points P and Q lie on an ellipse (standard eqn). The tangents and P and Q intersect at point T. The midpoint of PQ is the point M. Prove that OM extended (where O is origin) passes through the point T.
I've been giving this one some thought - most obvious approaches will result in an algebra bash of unnecessary complexity. I don't see a straight geometric approach, however here is a reasonable algebraic approach.

Let's assume that the point T is (x<sub>0</sub>, y<sub>0</sub>), in which case m<sub>OT</sub> = y<sub>0</sub> / x<sub>0</sub>. Since any two parallel lines with a common point are the same line, it will be sufficient to prove that m<sub>OM</sub> = y<sub>0</sub> / x<sub>0</sub>.

Now, the chord of contact from T is xx<sub>0</sub> / a<sup>2</sup> + yy<sub>0</sub> / b<sup>2</sup> = 1 _____(1)
It meets the ellipse at the points P and Q, and by making y the subject of (1), and putting it into the equation of the ellipse, we get a quadratic equation for the x coordinates of P and Q:
x<sup>2</sup> / a<sup>2</sup> + (1 / b<sup>2</sup>y<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>) * (b<sup>2</sup> - b<sup>2</sup>xx<sub>0</sub> / a<sup>2</sup>)<sup>2</sup> = 1
ie x<sup>2</sup>[(1 / a<sup>2</sup>) + (b<sup>2</sup>x<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup> / a<sup>4</sup>y<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>] - 2b<sup>2</sup>xx<sub>0</sub> / a<sup>2</sup>y<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup> - 1 + b<sup>2</sup> / y<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0

We don't care what the solutions are, but we do care what their average is, as it is the x coordinate of M. Thus,
x coordinate of M = -B / 2A = (2b<sup>2</sup>x<sub>0</sub> / a<sup>2</sup>y<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>) / 2[(1 / a<sup>2</sup>) + (b<sup>2</sup>x<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup> / a<sup>4</sup>y<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>] = a<sup>2</sup>b<sup>2</sup>x<sub>0</sub> / (a<sup>2</sup>y<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup> + b<sup>2</sup>x<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>)

By making x the subject of (1), we can similarly find an equation whose solution is the y coordinate of P and Q, and use it to show that the y coordinate of M is a<sup>2</sup>b<sup>2</sup>y<sub>0</sub> / (b<sup>2</sup>x<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup> + a<sup>2</sup>y<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>)

Thus, m<sub>OM</sub> = [a<sup>2</sup>b<sup>2</sup>y<sub>0</sub> / (b<sup>2</sup>x<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup> + a<sup>2</sup>y<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>)] / [a<sup>2</sup>b<sup>2</sup>x<sub>0</sub> / (a<sup>2</sup>y<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup> + b<sup>2</sup>x<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup>)] = y<sub>0</sub> / x<sub>0</sub>, as required.

Note that this approach requires both x<sub>0</sub> and y<sub>0</sub> to both be non-zero. However, if either of these is zero, then the point T lies on an axes, and symmetry dictates that M must lie on the same axis - try drawing the diagram if you're not convinced - and thus the theorem is obviously true for these cases as well.
 
Last edited:

DcM

Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2003
Messages
53
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
wahhh
that way is sooo much betta..
even tho its still complicated but its a good approach!!

its clever how u used sum of roots to get the midpt..its like one of those tricks and short cuts...i didnt get it at first wen i learnt it @ tutoring...
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,638
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Originally posted by DcM
wahhh
that way is sooo much betta..
even tho its still complicated but its a good approach!!
Thanks - it shows that a bit of thought will usually simplify even an algebra bash Q...
its clever how u used sum of roots to get the midpt..its like one of those tricks and short cuts...i didnt get it at first wen i learnt it @ tutoring...
This is (IMO) a 'standard' trick - always ask yourself if you seek to find something not requested in the question - "Do I really care what this is?" - As an example, consider Q2 in the recent set of conics questions. The best solution involved finding neither PT nor PN - all we cared about was their ratio, and that could be accessed another way. :)
 

OLDMAN

Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2003
Messages
251
Location
Mudgee
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
This is a useful thread. Should be bumped up again closer to exam time for revision.
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,638
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Do people want me to post the answers to those questions that have not yet been answered? Alternately, are people still working on them?
 

Calculon

Mohammed was a paedophile
Joined
Feb 15, 2004
Messages
1,743
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
The conics tip in this post should be added to the HSC tips forum
 

Grey Council

Legend
Joined
Oct 14, 2003
Messages
1,426
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
for question 4:
I used m<sub>1</sub> * m<sub>2</sub> = -1
but after that I end up using t formulas. :-\

I get b^2/a^2 * sin@sin# / ((cos@-1)(cos#-1))
somehow I have to get the
sin@sin# / ((cos@-1)(cos#-1))
to equal 1.
how?

edit:
that is to say, I CAN do it, but since we aren't looking for algebra bashes, and t formulae are (algebra bashing)^2, me is looking for a better, elegant solution.
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top