sooo wut u get? (1 Viewer)

[fashionista]

is there anyone out there like me hoo predicted their marx for 2004 and got a uai prediction?? huh huh...telll me im not tha only one!
soooo wut'd u get???
i range between 90-99 (the latter was a heaps big pipedream)
YAY FOR SAM!!! better be right!!

 

[honky tonk]

Don't forget it's not a predictor.. the 2004 results could be extremely different.

 

[fashionista]

yeh i took that into account..this yrs results will prob be lower considering that over the last 3 yrs uai values have decreased.

 

[honky tonk]

That's why it can be good to underestimate your abilities and not be so generous when predicting your marks. I've always thought it's better to be pleasantly surprised than disappointed.

 

[Sarah168]

well taking that into consideration, mine would approximately be roughly between 96-98! now its down to the hard work to actually get that in reality!

 

[fashionista]

woweee!! yay for u!!!

 

[honky tonk]

Originally posted by Sarah168
now its down to the hard work to actually get that in reality!

Yeah, that bit's a drag.

 

[Rahul]

the hard bit is guessing what your actual hsc mark will be.

 

[perfectionist]

yeah true...school assessment marks don't always indicate how Your HSC will be...it all depends on the day of the exam.

 

[iambored]

Originally posted by perfectionist
yeah true...school assessment marks don't always indicate how Your HSC will be...it all depends on the day of the exam.

true. school assessment marks have NOTHING TO DO with the hsc exam. you don't know how difficult the exam will be as perfection said, but you also don't know how difficult your schools assessments are in comparison, how 'smart' your grade is when compared to the rest of the state

 

[honky tonk]

Very true.. my English school mark was 21 marks below my HSC mark.. :apig:

 

[lil_star]

my HSC mark for chem was 10 marks below my school mark i dont give a damn now

 

[jessum]

mine was 94 if i got like 80 in everything. if i work hard and get goood marks then i could get 98! exciting stuff! and i wasnt heaps unrealistic either.

 

[fashionista]

YAY FOR U!!!!!!! cuz ur stupid stupid hahahahahahahahahaha..io shud be doin my rtf....still dun understnad ur leavin to tha las minuteness..bad gurl!!

 

[Lazarus]

I might just reiterate what honky tonk said and point out that SAM was not designed to predict UAIs.

But you are of course free to interpret the information it provides in any manner you wish.

 

[username]

Im confused then, if it isn't a predictor, then what is it.

 

[Ragerunner]

Technically it's not really a UAI predictor unless you are able to predict your HSC marks, and even then the program doesn't try to predict the new scaling factors at all.

 

[username]

So whats the difference between the SMA and UAI seeker.

 

[gordo]

i got 99.9 with very hopeful marks,
but i guess the're possible with some hard yakka

 

[Lazarus]

Originally posted by username
Im confused then, if it isn't a predictor, then what is it.

It is an assessment modeller - it calculates what your UAI would have been had you sat the HSC in a previous year and achieved the marks entered.

Originally posted by username
So whats the difference between the SMA and UAI seeker.

In addition to attempting to calculate past UAIs, the UAISeeker tries to predict the scaling for the ensuing year and then uses this prediction to forecast students' UAIs.