• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

Soviet foriegn policy! PRETTY PLEASE HELP!!! (1 Viewer)

Joined
Mar 27, 2008
Messages
62
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
Freaking out... the syllabus dot point " soviet foriegn policy".... i get the "changing nature of foriegn policy" dot point... but i am not getting the "impact of changing ideology on foriegn policy" dot point....

yes i know it is probably staring me right in the face, but my brain is fried to a crisp!

any would be greatly(no HUMUNGIOUSLY) appreciated!

Thanks
 

Leo Vanguard

Hur Dur
Joined
Dec 5, 2008
Messages
30
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
It's pretty simple, what it means is how did communist ideology (and changes in it) affect foreign policy from 1917-1941 e.g. 1917 there was Brest-Litovisk and a belief in permanant revolution, however, as PR did not seem to be working (along with the advent of the Civil War resulting in a new set of problems for the Bolsheviks) this policy was abandoned. Further examples include the dual nature of communist foreign policy through Comintern (which encouraged worldwide revolution: "Workers of the world unite!") contrasted to the Commissariat for Foreign Affairs (which tried to make peace with the West and establish trade relations). Then you could talk about the impact of Stalinism (and Stalin's policy of "Socialism in One Country") and how this affected foreign policy (how the Comintern basically stopped functioning in 1935 due to changes in approach by Stalin) etc etc. As you can see, as ideology changes (for various reasons) this impacts on foreign policy. Hope this helped.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 27, 2008
Messages
62
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
Thanks yo have saved my life...well saved me from completly freaking out in the exam!

Thanks again!
 

KnifeySpoony

Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Messages
258
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
I wasn't too sure of thtat either, i gave the hotline a call and yeah bascially what they leo mentioned was true.
buttt, the guy i spoke to said something about mentioning its isolationed view with its err, i guess you could say peaceful co-existance with other ntions(like when it joined the league of nations in 1934). He mentioned to use this as an aim to coincide with the purpose for modernisation + industralissation, for trade along with the 5 year plans + collectivisation.
So you could use that maybe, i don't remmeber find much notes in textbooks to say that so, you could use it if u want(makes sense imo)
aanddd don't forget security with nazism.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top