stats regression (1 Viewer)

mouse

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2004
Messages
43
Help!

Let us suppose that besed on the data from 50 major cities and environmental
economist estimated a wage regression as follows:

WAGE = 103.7 - 1.2X1 - 2.1X2 + 3.6X3 + 2.3X3 R2 = 0.55

Where:

WAGE is the annual wage measured in $1000.
X1 is an index of recreational oppurtutnities.
X2 is an index of educational oppurtunities.
X3 is an index of crime (crime rate).
X4 is an index of air pollution.

The above regression (especially R2) tells us that 55 percent of the variability in WAGE is explained by the regresion of WAGE on the explanatory
variables X1, X2, X3, X4.

The regression coefficient (-2.1) associated with the explanatory variable X2 can be interpreted as follows:

All else equal, if educational oppurtunity index of a city A is 1 unit more than the same index of city B, then the annual wage rate of city A is $2100 less than in city B. That is a person ho has to work in city B with less educational oppurtunity compared to city A must be compensated trough his/her wage by an additional amount of $2100.

Your task in this problem is to interpret in the same manner the coeeficent associated with the variable X4, the air pollution variable.

Thanks!
 

:: ck ::

Actuarial Boy
Joined
Jan 1, 2003
Messages
2,414
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
i got 103....

just kiddin.. wot the hell is this o_O actuary
 

turtle_2468

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
408
Location
North Shore, Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2002
sigh... mouse, you know that
1) this is probably an assignment q which you should do yourself
2) If it isn't, try to do it first, and don't just copy and paste/type it in and expect an answer
3) you'll be screwed come exam time if you don't understand it...
Anyway, just trying to help in the long term...
 

Affinity

Active Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Messages
2,062
Location
Oslo
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2003
It isn't that difficult... I think it's asking you how a unit difference in polution (index of) will affect the wage level.

Looks like economics
 

Grey Council

Legend
Joined
Oct 14, 2003
Messages
1,426
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Originally posted by mouse
turtle, do you understand the problem because i don't.:(
You should see your lecturer then. lol, if you don't understand it at all, then you need help, solving this question won't help you.
I think
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,644
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
The regression coefficient (+3.6) associated with the explanatory variable X3 can be interpreted as follows:

All else equal, if crime rate index of a city A is 1 unit more than the same index of city B, then the annual wage rate of city A is $3600 more than in city B. That is a person who has to work in city A with a higher crime rate compared to city B must be compensated through his/her wage by an additional amount of $3600.

would be the answer if they had asked about the variable X3. You really should be able out from this how to interpret the variable X4.

Also, if you can't follow Grey Council's suggestion and ask a lecturer, how about a tutor? or a colleague in your course? or a student a year ahead of you? surely there is someone who could offer you some help.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top