syllabus dot pnt help plz (1 Viewer)

kim_

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2005
Messages
132
Hey i was wondering if any one could help me out with this syllabus dot point

process information from secondary sources to describe recent discoveries of elements

thanx any help would be appreciated
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2004
Messages
3,550
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005

rnitya_25

Abhishek's Rani..
Joined
Mar 19, 2005
Messages
1,578
Location
Mars
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
hsc.csu.edu.au:
The nineteen transuranic elements with the atomic numbers above 95 (Z between 96 and 116, leaving out undiscovered 113 and 115) require high-energy particle accelerators to be produced. Use an Internet search engine and recent references to find out how particle accelerators are used to discover new transuranic elements. To process the sources you find, assess their reliability by comparing the information provided. Look for consistency of information.
 

Abtari

Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
604
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
rnitya_25 said:
hsc.csu.edu.au:
The nineteen transuranic elements with the atomic numbers above 95 (Z between 96 and 116, leaving out undiscovered 113 and 115) require high-energy particle accelerators to be produced. Use an Internet search engine and recent references to find out how particle accelerators are used to discover new transuranic elements. To process the sources you find, assess their reliability by comparing the information provided. Look for consistency of information.
i think the issue is describe recent discoveries of elements.. not how transuranic elements are made lol

im confused over this dotpoint too...couldnt find any info
 

currysauce

Actuary in the making
Joined
Aug 31, 2004
Messages
576
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
well i am using neptunium and americium

the 1940-1950's are recent enough for me
 

Pace_T

Active Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
1,784
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
I've done element 110 and 111. Formerly known as ununnulium and ununnunium (spelling? LOL!)
I got all the information I needed from www.webelements.com (I think that's the link, or you can google it)
 

Abtari

Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
604
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
as long as you describe when they were discovered, where and how, i think it doesn't matter which elements you choose. i would be cautious about 'recent' though. don't know how recent they want the elements to be... (could be within the last decade, or even last century... :confused: )
 

kim_

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2005
Messages
132
hey thanx guys that does help, coz lyk der so much things n u doont know what to put in and what to take out
 

Mannie

New Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
11
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
menty said:
Unonoctium-238 was discovered in 1999 in UC Berkeky in a particle accelerator by the bombardment of Kr-86 and Pb-208.
Wasn't this claim withdrawn after subsequent trials failed to produce results.
 

MrMe

Your Bestest Best Friend
Joined
May 13, 2005
Messages
97
Location
Denman!
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
i don't know which one but one of them ended up being a hoax
 

sushiii

New Member
Joined
May 4, 2007
Messages
7
Gender
Female
HSC
2007
currysauce said:
well i am using neptunium and americium

the 1940-1950's are recent enough for me
i couldnt find anything on americium could u help???

i hav the use of it in the industry; used to measure density and thickness, smoke detectors

but i cant find any benefits or problems of its use (connected with its properties) help plz?

unless u used it as a radio isotope in medical industry
 
Last edited:

xiao1985

Active Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2003
Messages
5,704
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
benefit of AM241: it's an alpha emitter... so even a trace of smoke particulate will block the radiation and trigger the alarm

problem: all radiation has the potential to hurt.
 

Forbidden.

Banned
Joined
Feb 28, 2006
Messages
4,436
Location
Deep trenches of burning HELL
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
xiao1985 said:
benefit of AM241: it's an alpha emitter... so even a trace of smoke particulate will block the radiation and trigger the alarm

problem: all radiation has the potential to hurt.
If you chucked a smoke alarm in space it'll go off regardless.

There's an ionization chamber in a smoke alarm.
Incoming gas molecules in the air are ionized at a constant rate by the alpha emitter Americium-241, and since those ionized molecules now contain a charge they can conduct electricity within the electric field of the ionizing chamber.

If this rate of ionization falls, noted by less charge carriers within the electric field then an alarm will be trigggered.

And yes radiation has the potential to hurt :eek: ... even at low energies ...
 

sushiii

New Member
Joined
May 4, 2007
Messages
7
Gender
Female
HSC
2007
heyy yerr thanks both of youu

that is useful info

lol i cant beleive i forgot that its harmful such an obovious problem lol
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top