MedVision ad

SYLLABUS POINT – significance of the Mithridatic and Parthian wars (1 Viewer)

cankerblossome

New Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2009
Messages
12
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2009
What's that all about??? I can get what the wars WERE from Wikipedia, but does anyone know why they were significant enough to warrant their own dot point?

(Here's the Wiki stuff-)

There were three Mithridatic Wars between Rome and the Kingdom of Pontus in the first century BC. They are named for Mithridates VI who was King of Pontus at the time.
The force of the Kingdom of Pontus was destroyed, Rome affirmed its power on Anatolia.

Antony's Parthian War of 40-33 BC was a conflict following the Battle of Carrhae, between the Roman Republic, represented in the East by the triumvir Mark Antony, and the Parthians. Although the campaign ended in distastrous defeat for Antony, the war was a strategic draw when peace was made by Augustus.
Background
Julius Caesar, after ensuring victory in his civil war, planned a campaign into the Parthian Empire after a brief pacification of Dacia. After his assassination, the Second Triumvirate usurped power in Rome in a military dictatorship. After the defeat of Caesar's assassins at the Battle of Philippi, Caesarian rule over the Republic was effectively ensured. Shortly after, however, with the triumvirs preoccupied with the revolt of Sextus Pompeius in Sicily, Parthia attacked Roman-controlled Syria and the client kingdom of Judea. Its high priest and ruler, Hyrcanus, was overthrown, tortured and sent as prisoner to Seleucia, and the pro-Parthian usurper Antigonus was installed in his place.
In Anatolia, the Parthians allied with Quintus Labienus, son of Caesar's general and later antagonist Titus Labienus, penetrating deep into the west and defeating a Roman army under Decidius Saxa. They were however defeated in turn by a veteran army led by Publius Ventidius Bassus, who drove the invaders from Roman territory.
The war
With the aid of Mark Antony, the son-in-law of Hyrcanus, Herod, returned to Judea and recaptured Jerusalem in 37 BC. Antony then went on to attack the Parthian Empire itself, marching into Atropatene (present-day Iranian Azerbaijan) with some 100,000 legionaries, aided by the Roman client kings in Armenia, Galatia, Cappadocia and sovereign Pontus. The campaign proved a disaster however, after a Roman slipup at Phraaspa, capital of Atropatene, and thousands of Romans and auxiliaries died during the retreat due to the cold winter.
Subsequent events
Antony later went on to annex Armenia, afraid the kingdom would seek Parthian support, but the war didn't end formally until 20 BC, by a peace made by Augustus, ensuring the return of the captured legionary eagles of Crassus' and Saxa's armies, Antony's main excuse for the invasion of Parthia proper.
 

cem

Premium Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2005
Messages
2,438
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
What's that all about??? I can get what the wars WERE from Wikipedia, but does anyone know why they were significant enough to warrant their own dot point?

(Here's the Wiki stuff-)

There were three Mithridatic Wars between Rome and the Kingdom of Pontus in the first century BC. They are named for Mithridates VI who was King of Pontus at the time.
The force of the Kingdom of Pontus was destroyed, Rome affirmed its power on Anatolia.

Antony's Parthian War of 40-33 BC was a conflict following the Battle of Carrhae, between the Roman Republic, represented in the East by the triumvir Mark Antony, and the Parthians. Although the campaign ended in distastrous defeat for Antony, the war was a strategic draw when peace was made by Augustus.
Background
Julius Caesar, after ensuring victory in his civil war, planned a campaign into the Parthian Empire after a brief pacification of Dacia. After his assassination, the Second Triumvirate usurped power in Rome in a military dictatorship. After the defeat of Caesar's assassins at the Battle of Philippi, Caesarian rule over the Republic was effectively ensured. Shortly after, however, with the triumvirs preoccupied with the revolt of Sextus Pompeius in Sicily, Parthia attacked Roman-controlled Syria and the client kingdom of Judea. Its high priest and ruler, Hyrcanus, was overthrown, tortured and sent as prisoner to Seleucia, and the pro-Parthian usurper Antigonus was installed in his place.
In Anatolia, the Parthians allied with Quintus Labienus, son of Caesar's general and later antagonist Titus Labienus, penetrating deep into the west and defeating a Roman army under Decidius Saxa. They were however defeated in turn by a veteran army led by Publius Ventidius Bassus, who drove the invaders from Roman territory.
The war
With the aid of Mark Antony, the son-in-law of Hyrcanus, Herod, returned to Judea and recaptured Jerusalem in 37 BC. Antony then went on to attack the Parthian Empire itself, marching into Atropatene (present-day Iranian Azerbaijan) with some 100,000 legionaries, aided by the Roman client kings in Armenia, Galatia, Cappadocia and sovereign Pontus. The campaign proved a disaster however, after a Roman slipup at Phraaspa, capital of Atropatene, and thousands of Romans and auxiliaries died during the retreat due to the cold winter.
Subsequent events
Antony later went on to annex Armenia, afraid the kingdom would seek Parthian support, but the war didn't end formally until 20 BC, by a peace made by Augustus, ensuring the return of the captured legionary eagles of Crassus' and Saxa's armies, Antony's main excuse for the invasion of Parthia proper.
How did these wars contribute to the relationship between the leading Romans?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top