RogueAcademic
Member
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2007
- Messages
- 859
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- N/A
Reading the Australian Financial Review today - the Australian Law Reform Commission upheld legal privilege protection for lawyers. This legal privilege was also extended to tax advice offered by tax accountants.
That got me thinking - the obvious difference between a tax lawyer and a tax accountant is law and numbers. But there would still be significant overlap? A tax accountant would need to know what the law is to know where to put the numbers and a tax lawyer would need to know the numbers to be able to know how to apply the law.
So what's the difference between the advice given between these two professions, particularly now that the law reform commission has acknowledged that advice given by tax accountants should fall under legal privilege too?
That got me thinking - the obvious difference between a tax lawyer and a tax accountant is law and numbers. But there would still be significant overlap? A tax accountant would need to know what the law is to know where to put the numbers and a tax lawyer would need to know the numbers to be able to know how to apply the law.
So what's the difference between the advice given between these two professions, particularly now that the law reform commission has acknowledged that advice given by tax accountants should fall under legal privilege too?