Termanator 4 (1 Viewer)

[samuelblayden]

Have you heard they are doing termantor 4 without arnould it is going to be a floop. check out movies to come at www.killermovies.com

 

[wasted_emotions]

Yeh they HAVE to have Arnie or its not the same, cuz we all know Arnie is king

 

[Purp|e]

oh my ... this has to be stopped. the fact that they made a 3rd was just stupid ... now its just getting out of hand

<3 arnie

 

[SashatheMan]

if arny was in the forth terminator, it would be soemtihng like this

 

[line_backer]

they've had 3 attempts on john connors life ffs
why dont they just send T-1000 back to the year 1850 to kill connors great great grand dad

 

[mcdickpants 2.5]

yeah its retarderated.

the time travel in it is soooo flawed.

 

[line_backer]

in T4 they should have a female cyborg that spawns naked in the middle of a packed footbal stadium

 

[SashatheMan]

in T4 they should have a female cyborg that spawns naked in the middle of a packed footbal stadium

lol
yeh they always seem to spawn in the quitest of streets.

 

[line_backer]

yep i agree, they should focus more on the actual human Vs. machine war than the assassination attempts, the graphics and special effects of the war in T1 and T2 was thrilling and violent and the machines were so technologically awesome
especially those lasers, skeleton robots and flying laser machines and tanks

 

[jumb]

They need more nudity.

Killer robots + nude, hot chicks = success!

 

[SashatheMan]

They need more nudity.

Killer robots + nude, hot chicks = success!

dude u cant just put nudity in every film, other wise it becomes cheesy, terminator 2 didnt have nudity and its the best one of the thrillogy

 

[Korn]

They would have to have the 4th movie set in the war, since the end of Terminator 3 judgement day occurs****SPOILER END

The movie should have John Connor and Kate Brewster also, it doesnt really need Arnold, as he was all about assassinating Connor in the first movie, then about saving him, The only purpose Arnold would now fill is being a normal terminator, and depending on when they set the movie, his series may have not been invented yet.
***SPOILER*** Also how did the machines survive the nuclear war, they targeted all the cities annd thats were the machines and factories to make machines, would have been****SPOILER END

 

[Korn]

They're not really spoilers to anyone who has common sense.
Also, what makes you think Machine production sites (also top secret military installations) would be located in major cities? They're out there in remote localities, for security reasons.

They would be using car manufacturing, and also would have likely nuked all military instillations, to prevent and armed resistance

 

[Korn]

Ah okay. I only saw cities being nuked in that brief bit at the end of T3.

Yeah, thats all they showed, but think about it strategically, would u want your enemy having the capablity to arm themselves?
Would u want trained soldiers still alive?
Would u want military hardware still availible to the humans (tanks, airplanes, artillary)?

 

[line_backer]

maybe the humans used computers to reprogram parts or skynet or infiltration units and took their weapons

 

[Korn]

maybe the humans used computers to reprogram parts or skynet or infiltration units and took their weapons

How, skynet controlled all computers that were connected to the web

 

[line_backer]

human hackers

 

[Enlightened_One]

The one thing that Terminater 4 would need to include would be Kyle Reece (or however his name is spelt). He is the man from the original Terminater who travelled back through time. He is John Connor's father and best friend. Though they'd have to find a similiar looking actor because the bloke who played him has aged 20 or more years.

Terminater 4 would probably be about the war and would probably focus on John Connor's uniting and leading of the people and would probably finish with them smashing the defence grid and senjding Reece back to intercept the original terminater. Hence the cricle is complete and we are back to the beginning of the original movie.

 

[line_backer]

yep agreed....reece was played by michael biehn who now is middle aged at least

some good human vs robot war scenes would be good too not just connor-one-man-leading-and-winning thing

 

[Korn]

The one thing that Terminater 4 would need to include would be Kyle Reece (or however his name is spelt). He is the man from the original Terminater who travelled back through time. He is John Connor's father and best friend. Though they'd have to find a similiar looking actor because the bloke who played him has aged 20 or more years.

Terminater 4 would probably be about the war and would probably focus on John Connor's uniting and leading of the people and would probably finish with them smashing the defence grid and senjding Reece back to intercept the original terminater. Hence the cricle is complete and we are back to the beginning of the original movie.

I doubt it the series would be ended in one movie of the future, thats what the series has been leading up to.
Anyways i thought the guy they got to play John Connor in T3 would have been able to play Reece

michael biehn

Nick Stahl