• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

The Department of Immigration (1 Viewer)

L

LaraB

Guest
Asquithian said:
They are :)

...which shows that it is wrong to say that people 'choose' to come when most are legit. LEgit refugees dont really choose.
yeah isn't that whate a refugee means?

as in what makes a refugees different from a migrant or illegal migrant?

way i understand it is that to be a refugee you have to be seeking 'refuge' from something not just moving for the fun of it so logically i guess that means they don't choose to migrate its more a safety thing or whatever
 

Generator

Active Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2002
Messages
5,244
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Revealed: How nation failed Rau
Jeremy Roberts and Michelle Wiese Bockmann
June 29, 2005


CORNELIA Rau spent five weeks in Baxter detention centre before being assessed by a psychiatrist, even though she had arrived in a distressed and confused state, the official inquiry into her case has found.

In the explosive extracts of the secret report obtained by The Australian, former federal police chief Mick Palmer finds Ms Rau was also refused admission to a mental institution because the hospital had a policy of admitting only one Baxter detainee at a time.

Mr Palmer describes the detention centre as "manifestly inadequate".

He finds Ms Rau, who was wrongly detained for four months as a suspected illegal immigrant, was the victim of poor mental health provision at the centre, poor communications between centre and healthcare professionals and lack of flexibility by staff.

Mr Palmer's report says the psychiatrist visited Baxter just once during the four months Ms Rau was wrongly incarcerated there, and just eight times last year, even though there is a "heightened incidence" of mental illess among detainees.

"The current situation at Baxter lacks clearly defined leadership and continuity of care," Mr Palmer concludes.

He recommends that the Immigration Department establish a city-based mental health unit to treat detainees held around Australia. But he also recommends that Baxter replace its mental health service sub-contractors with the state government providers that also appeared to botch her care.

German-born Ms Rau, who called herself Anna Brotmeyer, was wrongly detained for 10 months in immigration detention, including four months at Baxter.

Mr Palmer reveals it took almost three months, three direct requests and the eventual intervention of South Australia's mental health chief for sub-contracted medical staff at Baxter to organise with state mental health services to assess and commit Ms Rau.

Mr Palmer concludes "cumbersome" medical sub-contracting arrangements made by GSL, the private operator at Baxter, meant "there was an apparent lack of leadership, a lack of cohesion and a lack of a systematic approach to deal with continuity of care".

"It would be in the interests of good patient care to minimise the number and tiers of separate healthcare," he says.

Mr Palmer says that when two hunger-striking detainees from Baxter were admitted on New Year's Eve, admitting Ms Rau was then "likely to be resisted by Glenside (psychiatric hospital in Adelaide)".

Although a Baxter medical doctor diagnosed Ms Rau with "schizoid or schizotypal personality features" on January 7, "following discussions with a Glenside psychiatrist it was agreed that (Rau's) behaviour would not justify detention under the mental health act at that time", Mr Palmer says.

"It was obvious to the inquiry that in South Australia the two systems operate to the detriment of the potential patient -- the Baxter system of privately contracted clinicians and the SA government mental health system."

Six days after Mr Rau was admitted to Baxter in October last year under the name of Anna Brotmeyer, a psychologist diagnosed a personality disorder. But a recommended transfer to the all-female compound at Villawood detention centre in Sydney was not pursued.

In early November, Baxter's consultant psychiatrist, in his only consultation with Ms Rau, recommended she be assessed at Glenside.

But the state's Remote and Rural Mental Health Service triage team, which was to carry out the assessment, "seemed unsure of their relationship with Baxter" and failed to get back with clarification, Mr Palmer finds.

The team removed Ms Rau from their books for in-patient placement and did not notify Baxter staff. When the Baxter psychologist then sent a fax of patient notes to Glenside, the "information was insufficient to re-activate (Ms Rau's) place on the waiting list for assessment. They neglected to inform the Baxter staff."

Less than a week after Mr Palmer completed and began circulating his draft early this month, Immigration Minister Amanda Vanstone offered new temporary bridging visas to 50 long-term detainees.

Among them were nine receiving treatment for severe depression at Glenside and almost 20 at Baxter.

Source: http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,15764026%5E601,00.html
I wonder if the Minister is still entertaining the thought of keeping the report under wraps.
 

Enlightened_One

King of Bullshit
Joined
Oct 28, 2003
Messages
1,105
Location
around about here - still
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
I wonder if we'll ever see the return of 'ministerial responsibility'. I don't know about throwing open the doors (I'm a paranoid bastard) but the current situation is not working. Still, I don't know if anyone has any better ideas how to handle the whole illgeal immigration thing? Maybe one of Nelson's 'research intensive' unis could do a study. Maybe they all could, and the one who works out a feasible way to handle the fiasco gets funding.
 

Generator

Active Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2002
Messages
5,244
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
anti-mathmite said:
see, that's just stupid. Its blatent propaganda from the left. What on earth would sacking the minister for immigration do? They would be replaced with someone who would do exactly the same job, and would be governed by the same laws, and who would have the same attitudes (or supposed "problems") as the person who would be fired. It's just a (lame) attempt at trying to put dirt onto the government.

"Oh gee, the minister should be fired. I wonder if they are doing a crap job. Gee maybe they shouldn't be in that job after all.. Doiiiiii lets elect labor to that position?"
Thanks for yet another enlightening post.

It's called ministerial accountability, and even if it's largely symbolic and unfairly targets the current minister, it is a valid concept that should be upheld by all ministers that seek to preserve the 'honour' that is meant to be representing the citisens of a nation-state. Also, it isn't a 'left arguing against the unfair right' issue as it applies to all parties across the political spectrum, so get off your supposed high-horse and actually conisder the point rationally rather than force us all to suffer through your substandard anti-left rantings.
 
Last edited:

Generator

Active Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2002
Messages
5,244
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Immigration head departs in wake of report
July 10, 2005 - 10:53AM


Andrew Metcalf is to take up the position of secretary of the Immigration Department, Prime Minister John Howard announced today.

Mr Metcalf, who is currently deputy secretary of the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, will replace current secretary Bill Farmer.

Mr Farmer will become Australia's ambassador to Indonesia when David Ritchie returns.

Mr Farmer's departure from the Immigration Department comes just days after a scathing report into the wrongful detention of mentally ill woman Cornelia Rau was tabled in Queensland Parliament.

In a draft copy of his report, former federal police commissioner Mick Palmer found a series of serious failures by the Immigration Department aggravated Ms Rau's mental illness.

Mr Palmer was critical of the department's policy of contracting out services, particularly health care, and said the situation was inappropriate and inadequate.

But Mr Howard today rejected suggestions Mr Farmer was falling on his sword, while Immigration Minister Amanda Vanstone and Attorney-General Philip Ruddock escape unscathed.

"Ultimately governments are accountable at the ballot box," Mr Howard said on the Nine Network.

"I think ministers should go when plainly they have been directly responsible and I think ministers should be in difficulty if their continued presence is an embarrassment to the government.

"I don't think that could ever be said of either Mr Ruddock or Senator Vanstone - they've both been very good ministers and they have a lot of wide public support and respect."

AAP


Source: http://www.smh.com.au/news/national...-wake-of-report/2005/07/10/1120934114420.html
The final version of the Palmer report should be presented to the Minister later this week, but whether it will be made publicly available in full is still not known.
 

Meldrum

Banned
Joined
Oct 20, 2004
Messages
1,270
Location
Gone.
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
I'm pissed off to see that yet again the media were only given 10 minutes to read the Palmer Report before both Howard and Vanstone answered questions on it - and only on the report. Almost every sentence finished with "...of course, if were to read the report you would know that."

Fucking Vanstone...
 

ujuphleg

oo-joo-fleg
Joined
Jan 2, 2004
Messages
3,040
Location
Sydney
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2004
Generator said:
*bump*

Why is peace man a threat? Ruddock won't say

Of particular interest given the recent proposals that the federal Government believes will help combat terrorism.
Not to mention the fact that its costing him $130 a day to be detained.

I suppose this really crystallises the debate over the anti terror laws. On the one hand, its pretty obvious that in this day and age, tighter security has to be exercised, not really because we're scared as such but more as a matter of common sense.

On the other hand, where does the buck stop? This guy had a six month approved visa and he's been here for three. His presence in this country doesn't incite people to protest - they're doing it anyways, he's just helping. The fact that his detention is being done in the interests of "national security"poses the very interesting question of when what comes under the banner of national security. It becomes a matter of civil liberties in terms of how much the state can/should control the affairs of the people within its borders.

I really should stop studying so much Government...
 

Generator

Active Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2002
Messages
5,244
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
*bump*

Family pleads for deportee's return

Jovicic's deportation 'disproportionate punishment'

TONY BURKE: The starting principle in all of this has to be that nobody should ever be rendered stateless. There's other principles that have to be taken into account as well. There are cases, and a number of cases, where it is appropriate for someone following a series of criminal offences to be deported to another nation. One of the issues we have to remember here is we're talking about a man, who for 36 of his 38 years lived in Australia, speaks with an Australian accent as broad as yours or mine. It's not a simple issue, but the starting principle has to be nobody should ever be rendered stateless.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top