-
Finished your HSC? Check out our University Discussion, Non-School forums or help out next year's HSC students! -
YOU can help the next generation of students in the community! Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
The Desalination Plant (2 Viewers)
- Thread starter Generator
- Start date
supercharged
Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2005
- Messages
- 789
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- N/A
Not matter how good the technology, eventually human error, machine malfunction and poor maintaince will occur, who wants to be the one drinking accidentally contaminated faecal/urine water?Gavrillo said:
loquasagacious
NCAP Mooderator
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2004
- Messages
- 3,636
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- 2004
So Gavrillo Australias best technicians etc etc can filter out shit..... then why build a desalinisation plant which would entail desalinating and filtering when you could just filter it???
neo o
it's coming to me...
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2002
- Messages
- 3,294
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2004
http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/sewage-to-star-in-water-plan/2005/07/14/1120934364087.html
On water recycling in Toowoomba...
On water recycling in Toowoomba...
Personally, I'm not sure whether it's as feasible to create drinking water for Sydney through effluent treatment as it is in smaller country towns, but we could definately treat water for use in agriculture and industry. As I said before, the only way to solve the problem isn't through something like a desalination plant but a restructuring of water prices for industries, subsidies for the uptake of green technology by home owners, regulations enforcing the installation of green technology in new developments and effluent treatment.SMH said:
Last edited:
loquasagacious
NCAP Mooderator
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2004
- Messages
- 3,636
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- 2004
As a city with sanitation and town water Sydney already has the infrastructure, simply upgrade the STPs and connect them so that they discahrge into the mains...
Rafy
Retired
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2004
- Messages
- 10,719
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2005
- Uni Grad
- 2008
Desalination plant dumped: it was a stinker with voters, to be frank
By Anne Davies State Political Editor
February 8, 2006
SYDNEY'S unpopular desalination plant will be put on ice by the State Government after a community outcry and fears that it would cost the Labor Party votes at the March 2007 election.
Cabinet met yesterday and was presented with the initial results of drilling in western Sydney, which revealed there might be up to 30 gigalitres a year of groundwater in aquifers. That would nearly match the 45 gigalitres a year that might have been produced by the Kurnell desalination plant.
The groundwater has been known about for several years, but the scale of the reserves was untested. The most recent testing provides the Government with the political figleaf to put the plant on hold for several years. The reserves are large enough to provide additional water for several years. But mining the aquifers will raise questions of the environmental effects of extracting groundwater on this scale. Cities such as Perth have used groundwater to augment supply.
Eammon Fitzpatrick, a spokesman for the Premier, Morris Iemma, confirmed last night that "the Government is looking at alternative sources of water … We will make no comment on the status of desalination."
The two consortiums bidding to build the plant have been given signals in the past fortnight to go slow on their submission because the $1.3 billion plant at Kurnell was going on the backburner.
They had expected the tender documents to be available last month but were told by Sydney Water that they should stop work on the proposal. The Government is still likely to buy the Kurnell land and build a pilot plant, but a full-scale plant will not be built unless needed. The new trigger is likely to be when the dam system falls to 30 per cent full.
The backflip follows two weeks of angry community meetings at which the Government has attempted to explain the detail of the planned 125 megalitre a day plant. The most recent meetings in Marrickville, a seat where the Government faces a threat from the Greens, were just as hostile.
The plant has faced universal opposition from the environmental movement because of the massive power consumption needed to run it. The Government's estimates recognised the plant would add 2 per cent to Sydney's power consumption.
The former premier Bob Carr approved the plant last year, weeks before retiring. He was convinced to back the plant after the then utilities minister, Frank Sartor, told him Sydney needed an alternative source of water.
But Mr Iemma has struggled to sell the idea. Dam levels have risen with recent rains and are now 45 per cent. The change of heart follows a report from two experts, Dr Stuart White and David Campbell, to the water subcommittee of cabinet. As well as the aquifer water, they identified recycling opportunities of up to 70 gigalitres a year.
The newly discovered aquifers are in the Southern Highlands and western Sydney, near the Hawkesbury River.
- SMH
http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/desalination-plant-dumped/2006/02/07/1139074234090.html
By Anne Davies State Political Editor
February 8, 2006
SYDNEY'S unpopular desalination plant will be put on ice by the State Government after a community outcry and fears that it would cost the Labor Party votes at the March 2007 election.
Cabinet met yesterday and was presented with the initial results of drilling in western Sydney, which revealed there might be up to 30 gigalitres a year of groundwater in aquifers. That would nearly match the 45 gigalitres a year that might have been produced by the Kurnell desalination plant.
The groundwater has been known about for several years, but the scale of the reserves was untested. The most recent testing provides the Government with the political figleaf to put the plant on hold for several years. The reserves are large enough to provide additional water for several years. But mining the aquifers will raise questions of the environmental effects of extracting groundwater on this scale. Cities such as Perth have used groundwater to augment supply.
Eammon Fitzpatrick, a spokesman for the Premier, Morris Iemma, confirmed last night that "the Government is looking at alternative sources of water … We will make no comment on the status of desalination."
The two consortiums bidding to build the plant have been given signals in the past fortnight to go slow on their submission because the $1.3 billion plant at Kurnell was going on the backburner.
They had expected the tender documents to be available last month but were told by Sydney Water that they should stop work on the proposal. The Government is still likely to buy the Kurnell land and build a pilot plant, but a full-scale plant will not be built unless needed. The new trigger is likely to be when the dam system falls to 30 per cent full.
The backflip follows two weeks of angry community meetings at which the Government has attempted to explain the detail of the planned 125 megalitre a day plant. The most recent meetings in Marrickville, a seat where the Government faces a threat from the Greens, were just as hostile.
The plant has faced universal opposition from the environmental movement because of the massive power consumption needed to run it. The Government's estimates recognised the plant would add 2 per cent to Sydney's power consumption.
The former premier Bob Carr approved the plant last year, weeks before retiring. He was convinced to back the plant after the then utilities minister, Frank Sartor, told him Sydney needed an alternative source of water.
But Mr Iemma has struggled to sell the idea. Dam levels have risen with recent rains and are now 45 per cent. The change of heart follows a report from two experts, Dr Stuart White and David Campbell, to the water subcommittee of cabinet. As well as the aquifer water, they identified recycling opportunities of up to 70 gigalitres a year.
The newly discovered aquifers are in the Southern Highlands and western Sydney, near the Hawkesbury River.
- SMH
http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/desalination-plant-dumped/2006/02/07/1139074234090.html
Rafy
Retired
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2004
- Messages
- 10,719
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2005
- Uni Grad
- 2008
leetom
there's too many of them!
They have, for now. It is still apart of a tiered response plan to any fall in future damn levels. If capacity falls to 35%, the aquifers will be mined. If capacity falls to30%, the desalination plant will be built.TerrbleSpellor said:
Why though they plan to recycle only 13% of Sydney's water, I don't know. Structural complications I suppose.
Enlightened_One
King of Bullshit
Yeah, but given the that the newly discovered water beneath Sydney is not inexhaustible the debate is still relevant because some years (perhaps not too many) than the topic will arise once more. Perhaps it is Iemma's wishful thinking that this underground supply will last until he is out of office and thus the problem will be someone elses.
And in related news, did you hear that fool Iemma wanting to lessen, or completely remove, water restrictions in Sydney because of this new water supply. As I mentioned above, this wter won't last forever and the sooner it is used up then the sooner the desalination plant is back on the agenda.
Unless, of course, the state government becomes proactive and uses this respite to research and implement new schemes of water management and, possibly, water reusage and recycling. I doubt they will, unfortunately...
And in related news, did you hear that fool Iemma wanting to lessen, or completely remove, water restrictions in Sydney because of this new water supply. As I mentioned above, this wter won't last forever and the sooner it is used up then the sooner the desalination plant is back on the agenda.
Unless, of course, the state government becomes proactive and uses this respite to research and implement new schemes of water management and, possibly, water reusage and recycling. I doubt they will, unfortunately...