Nebuchanezzar
Banned
couldn't find the other one in the gaza threadAdmittedly founded on spurious premises with land that wasn't really theirs
couldn't find the other one in the gaza threadAdmittedly founded on spurious premises with land that wasn't really theirs
Hahaha. Wow, almost completely straight out of the nonsense socialist alliance rhetoric, would you be a member by any chance?Probably revenge. The Arabs are a little cross. You see, Israel killed about 2000 of them in three weeks not long ago. Do you remember that, Jew?
Yeah dude because racism = religious discrimination?
I'm afraid you got your tongue tied, daft cunt. What you should have said was: "Countries that cry foul at war, succeeding at drawing attention to Israel's abominable human rights record. SUCCESS."
Quoted for extra lulz.No it won't. The entire Western world sees Israel for what it is - a war mongering, murderous state that has no right to exist on its blood stained soil. Only the US and, for whatever reason, Canada bother to stick by Israel. Italy has pulled out because it is a farce, much like a lot of UN conferences regarding Israel.
The gap between Arab countries ("Islam" yeah gg fucktard) and Western countries will not widen - it will remain the same: united against Israel's needless and barbaric aggression. They simply won't be too fussed about attending a conference that will do very little for anyone.
please prove otherwise or go away.I wish I could pull bullshit out of my arse with no evidence whatsoever and have people believe it
Perhaps that is what it is to some countries, but this is definitely not the case for many of them.Jonothan, one needs to understand what Israel really is to the western world. It is just seen as a geopolitical off shore base to keep the Arabs in check. Other than that the west a dont really have any special affiliation with Israel. ESPECIALLY EUROPE.
lol jewAustralia ought to boycott.
Wisdom has SpokenSnub UN gabfest, argues Julie Bishop
Greg Sheridan, Foreign editor | March 07, 2009
Article from: The Australian
THE Opposition has urged the Rudd Government to boycott the forthcoming UN conference on racism, commonly known as Durban II.
At the first Durban conference on racism, in 2001, the final declaration did not stick to a statement of principle against racism but focused heavily on Israel, describing it as a racist and apartheid state. Both the US and Israel walked out and many delegates described the atmosphere as abusive and hostile.
Opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman Julie Bishop told The Weekend Australian: "Durban II looks likely to be every bit as one-sided as was Durban I. Instead of combating racism, Durban II is likely to become an agent of racism.
"It's our view that the Government should take no part in it. We should never get into the position of trading our principles, or our support for Israel.
"Just looking at the draft declaration of Durban II, it looks unsalvageable."
Ms Bishop said that with the process being negotiated by Libya, and Iran and Cuba riding shotgun, this revealed the character of Durban II.
The administration of US President Barack Obama decided late last week that it would decline to attend the conference. Soon after this, Italy made a similar decision. Canada had already decided some time ago not to attend.
A spokesman for the Rudd Government said it had not yet decided whether to attend Durban II and would decide on the basis of whether Australia could make a positive contribution or whether the conference would be marred by anti-Semitism.
As the conference is due to be held on April 27, it is expected that the Government will make an announcement in the next couple of weeks.
Story
that was an excellent argument comrade. may your intelligence and thought provoking prose continue to enlighten NCAP for many years to come.faggot said:Hahaha. Wow, almost completely straight out of the nonsense socialist alliance rhetoric, would you be a member by any chance?
*nukes Israel*"Those to whom evil is done do evil in return."
Kevin Rudd withdrew support for the Israeli settlements lolJaredR said:Australia ought to boycott.
No worries, good to get some feedback. Sometimes I just feel like I have to drop down a level - or two - to get a point across - particularly when I visit the State Library on the weekends to the sight of red commy flags.that was an excellent argument comrade. may your intelligence and thought provoking prose continue to enlighten NCAP for many years to come.
Flawless logic, yeah. But, like, then that would mean because Arabs have killed more of, like, other Arabs than Israel has that they are totally the greater evil and whatever.*nukes Israel*
Say what you want about like, Muslims being evil, and whatever? Fact remains that Israel has killed far more Arabs than Arabs have killed of any other nationality. Who has done evil? Why, Israel of course.l
No?Flawless logic, yeah. But, like, then that would mean because Arabs have killed more of, like, other Arabs than Israel has that they are totally the greater evil and whatever.
I'd like, lurve to hear u tell me y it's not like, good logic?guy said:Flawless logic, yeah.
I think one cannot refute that the Arabs have killed more of their own brethren than Israel has in her 60 years of Statehood. The biggest enemy of the Arabs are themselves.^Julie Bishop is a talentless hack, who brings negative attention to whichever portfolio she has a hold of.
that was an excellent argument comrade. may your intelligence and thought provoking prose continue to enlighten NCAP for many years to come.
*nukes Israel*
Say what you want about like, Muslims being evil, and whatever? Fact remains that Israel has killed far more Arabs than Arabs have killed of any other nationality. Who has done evil? Why, Israel of course.
Kevin Rudd withdrew support for the Israeli settlements lol
Deflection much?Assuming that, does that mean that we have no reason to criticise Israel anymore?
Nah, not really.I think one cannot refute that the Arabs have killed more of their own brethren than Israel has in her 60 years of Statehood. The biggest enemy of the Arabs are themselves.
Iraq Civil War, Iranian Revolution, Civil 'War' in Gaza between Hamas and Fatah, Black September (when the Jordanians killed thousands of Palestinian refugees, Arafat claimed 20,000+ deaths), Sudan, Hezbollah takeover of the Lebanese Government etc.Nah, not really.
Besides the normal homocidal activity in a society (such as murder and manslaughter) there are very few Arabs that have been killed by other Arabs since Israel's founding. Israel has killed far more Arabs than the Arab states have.