Casmira said:
Radiation? Well yes. There have been a few Swedish studies that have shown a loose correlation between phone radiation and certain types of tumors. However these studies have not been totally conclusive. As a result certain class action suits have been filed and dismissed in the US on the basis that there is not enough solid evidence to link phone radiation and health problems.
Either way I don't think holding a phone next to your head for long periods of time is a good idea. Mobile phone makers recognize the possible danger of phone radiation. As such they publish the 'SAR' of each phone. Certain phones have higher SARS than others. Also what I said previously about Samsung phones is untrue. From my research certain older Motorola phones have the highest SAR levels and current SE phones have higher SAR levels.
It can be confusing looking at the figures. The USA, Canada and Taiwan have different measuring standards to Australia and the EU. The current EU and Australian requirements measure radiation in terms of how much radiation is absorbed by 10g of human tissue when held next to the ear. All mobile handsets in Australia and the EU must be below a rating of 2.0.
In the USA, Canada and Taiwan radiation is measured in terms of radiation absorption per 1g of human tissue. To pass the standard in these nations the reading must be below 1.6.
----------------
Highest SAR US measurments.
1a. Motorola V120c 1.55
1b. Motorola V265 1.55
3. Motorola V70 1.54
4a. Motorola P8767 1.53
4b. Motorola ST7868 1.53
4c. Motorola ST7868W 1.53
7a. Motorola A845 1.51
7b. Panasonic Allure 1.51
7c. Treo 650 GSM 1.51
10. Sony Ericsson P910 1.50
Lowest US SAR measurments
1. Audiovox PPC66001 0.12
2. Motorola MPx200 0.2
3. Motorola Timeport L7089 0.22
4. Qualcomm pdQ-1900 0.2634
5. T-Mobile Sidekick 0.276
6a. Samsung SGH-S100 0.296
6b. Samsung SGH-S105 0.296
8. Sony Ericsson Z600 0.31
9. Mitsubishi G360 0.32
10. Siemens S40 0.33