So, you have to write about an organisation and you visit their website's about us section, you get the same information fromt heir website, however, you change around the wording and add abit of other information here and there. The site doesnt have an author, only the organisation and the year published. You go to use one of the online plagiarism detectors on the internet and it detects that nothing is plagiarised except for some terms that cannot be changed, ie, the names of the people of the organisation. I then correctly refernce this in the bibliography. Is this plagiarism?
Also, some websites dont have authors so when you do the (Hancock, 1954), how exactly are you meant to do it when there is no author? (Council of Diabetes, 1999)? Is it okay just to refernce it in the bibliography if this is the case?
Also, some websites dont have authors so when you do the (Hancock, 1954), how exactly are you meant to do it when there is no author? (Council of Diabetes, 1999)? Is it okay just to refernce it in the bibliography if this is the case?