Hey everyone, just after a bit of advice.
I've done my PIP on the changing representation of masculinity in advertising. My central methodology was a media analysis of 357 advertisements from 1950's and 2000's. In discussion I incorporate about 50 of them to demonstrate change, however I'm not sure whether to include all the others? Also, I have decided to include the ones i discuss in an appendix and cross-reference them to preserve clarity and coherence in my argument, otheriwse alot of pages will have pictures, a few lines of text and then more pictures; which will result in the argument becoming quite disjointed. Do you think this is ok?
I've done my PIP on the changing representation of masculinity in advertising. My central methodology was a media analysis of 357 advertisements from 1950's and 2000's. In discussion I incorporate about 50 of them to demonstrate change, however I'm not sure whether to include all the others? Also, I have decided to include the ones i discuss in an appendix and cross-reference them to preserve clarity and coherence in my argument, otheriwse alot of pages will have pictures, a few lines of text and then more pictures; which will result in the argument becoming quite disjointed. Do you think this is ok?