Why does.... (1 Viewer)

[Random_87]

You have alot of faith in Wes...

I think he would be much improved if he knew how to pass... But then again, with a side step like his, you dont need to pass to often.

Oh, and i like his tripping, lol. That was hillarious, and then defence was "he doesnt know the rules." hahahaha... ohh good times, good times...

 

[DRAGONZ]

Hehe whether Wes will be a gun or not wasn't the main point of my post, Eoin.

I was extolling the virtues .. well, lack thereof .. of supporting the Cronulla Sutherland Sharks.

I'm making the point that in BBSF's posts, he has referred to Covell as the next best thing since Goldthorpe and the next best thing since Walford.

Firstly, his statements imply that both Goldthorpe and Walford were better than what Covell is.

Secondly, both players were Dragons.

If I could be bothered doing mathematical induction, I reckon you'd end up proving:

Dragons > Sharks.(2^n) , where n = consecutive number of years Sharks have not won a premiership ... i.e. n ≥ 1 ; n Є J

For now, we can only prove this theorem to be true for 1 ≤ x ≤ 39.

At the completion of 2006, that will become 1 ≤ x ≤ 40.

And so on and so forth, until n --> ∞

 

[Random_87]

Hahaha, DRAGONZ your a clown.

At the end of 2006 it will be a Dragon vs. Shark GF and the sharks will win 32-28. You heard it here first. Feel free to quote me.

On a side note, hope your exams have been good, Rob. I know you like Maths, but i found questions 8, 9 and 10 of 2 unit so hard... but then again, i think you do 4 unit, so you didnt do the paper... ohh, it was almost as bad as Cronulla's post SOO form.

 

[kimi]

Why can i see maths? Cos i dont get it. Refer to bottom of my sig.


AND why do i always have to repeat myself?-

Shut. The. Fuck. Up. About. This. Covell. Adoration. Bullshit.​

Now please die.

At the end of 2006 it will be a Dragon vs. Shark GF and the sharks will win 32-28. You heard it here first. Feel free to quote me.

If that happens, ill put on a striptease for all of you. That. Just. Wont. Happen. kekeke



That is all.

 

[MuffinMan]

what? maths? stop talking about maths maths is dead as of 27.10.05 11.31am and
covell is crap...that is all

 

[Random_87]

If that happens, ill put on a striptease for all of you. That. Just. Wont. Happen. kekeke

Thanks for the offer kimi, but i'll stick to drinkin myself stupid

 

[king_of_boredom]

Hehe whether Wes will be a gun or not wasn't the main point of my post, Eoin.

I was extolling the virtues .. well, lack thereof .. of supporting the Cronulla Sutherland Sharks.

I'm making the point that in BBSF's posts, he has referred to Covell as the next best thing since Goldthorpe and the next best thing since Walford.

Firstly, his statements imply that both Goldthorpe and Walford were better than what Covell is.

Secondly, both players were Dragons.

If I could be bothered doing mathematical induction, I reckon you'd end up proving:

Dragons > Sharks.(2^n) , where n = consecutive number of years Sharks have not won a premiership ... i.e. n ≥ 1 ; n Є J

For now, we can only prove this theorem to be true for 1 ≤ x ≤ 39.

At the completion of 2006, that will become 1 ≤ x ≤ 40.

And so on and so forth, until n --> ∞

interesting. you're supposed to try for n =1, assume n = k, then let n = k + 1 though. AND, are you trying to prove though inequalities? or just basic induction?

HOLY F'CK what has happened to this place?? all this talk about one 'covell'. oh well. let us wait until after the hsc until i delve back into the realm that is BOS.

 

[kimi]

I hate you Joe. I really really hate you Joe. Why make reference to maths for? No love for you.




</3

what? maths? stop talking about maths maths is dead as of 27.10.05 11.31am and
covell is crap...that is all

Like. WTF/ do you attempt to steal every goddamn comment i make. Unoriginal bastard/ First it was Muffin. Now this. Like fuck OFF annoying asshole.

 

[shortygb]

interesting. you're supposed to try for n =1, assume n = k, then let n = k + 1 though. AND, are you trying to prove though inequalities? or just basic induction?

HOLY F'CK what has happened to this place?? all this talk about one 'covell'. oh well. let us wait until after the hsc until i delve back into the realm that is BOS.

id prefer covell talk over maths, bring it to the education forums....

 

[Bookie]

Now, I've donethe 2U hSC, and it wasnt too hard. I'm just starting off 3 unit, and my tutor hd previously gave me some idea about induction.

Now; Dragons^n =,< Sharks(2^n)

let n = 0, where n is premierships.

therefore (Dragons ^ 0 = 1) =,< Sharks(2^0) = Sharks.

therefore; 1 < Sharks.

lets assumne this for all values of 'n'.

now n + 1.

Dragons^(0+1) < Sharks (2^1)

Dragons < Sharks^2.

True. Therefore we can say the Sharks are greater than the Stains.

But in the end - [size=+5]COVELL IS THE BEST[/size]

Kimi's striptease eh. Unlikely with Fuckjob at fullback. Bring up Mitch Brown!

 

[shortygb]

Now, I've donethe 2U hSC, and it wasnt too hard. I'm just starting off 3 unit, and my tutor hd previously gave me some idea about induction.

Now; Dragons^n =,< Sharks(2^n)

let n = 0, where n is premierships.

therefore (Dragons ^ 0 = 1) =,< Sharks(2^0) = Sharks.

therefore; 1 < Sharks.

lets assumne this for all values of 'n'.

now n + 1.

Dragons^(0+1) < Sharks (2^1)

Dragons < Sharks^2.

True. Therefore we can say the Sharks are greater than the Stains.

But in the end - [size=+5]COVELL IS THE BEST[/size]

Kimi's striptease eh. Unlikely with Fuckjob at fullback. Bring up Mitch Brown!

i didnt think it was possible...sport is now boring...

sport + math = BORING!!!

 

[DRAGONZ]

interesting. you're supposed to try for n =1, assume n = k, then let n = k + 1 though. AND, are you trying to prove though inequalities? or just basic induction?

I'm not exactly sure what you mean here .. what would be happening is that you are proving an inequality to be true by mathematical induction ..
If you let n = 1, you will get Dragons > 2.(Sharks) ... essentially, this means that half a Dragons team is better than a whole Sharks team, which has been proved true on many an occasion. Therefore it is true for n = 1.

Then you assume it is true for n = k, getting Dragons > (2^k).Sharks ... Remember that (2^k).Sharks < Dragons ..

Then you prove true for n = k + 1, remembering that n currently lies between 1 and 39. Giving you:

Dragons > [2^(k+1)].Sharks
Dragons > 2.(2^k).Sharks

OMG you get the point by now.

Now, I've donethe 2U hSC, and it wasnt too hard. I'm just starting off 3 unit, and my tutor hd previously gave me some idea about induction.

Now; Dragons^n =,< Sharks(2^n)

let n = 0, where n is premierships.

therefore (Dragons ^ 0 = 1) =,< Sharks(2^0) = Sharks.

therefore; 1 < Sharks.

lets assumne this for all values of 'n'.

now n + 1.

Dragons^(0+1) < Sharks (2^1)

Dragons < Sharks^2.

True. Therefore we can say the Sharks are greater than the Stains.

First off, I said:

Dragons > Sharks.(2^n)

You'll note that there is no ^n associated with the Dragons

Then again, you totally changed my induction by making the inequality thing go to the left instead of the right.

 

[Bookie]

Then you dont need induction. Hence your idea was bullshit in the first place.

Thats like saying 3 > 0 (2^n).

Curse you Rob. Curse you.

 

[shortygb]

Then you dont need induction. Hence your idea was bullshit in the first place.

Thats like saying 3 > 0 (2^n).

Curse you Rob. Curse you.

ok math loving nerds take it to the math forum this is for SPORT

 

[Random_87]

ok math loving nerds take it to the math forum this is for SPORT

Dont you mean this is for [size=+5]COVELL?[/size]

 

[Bookie]

Well, it wouldnt be sport without [size=+5]Covell[/size], thats for sure.

 

[shortygb]

Dont you mean this is for [size=+5]COVELL?[/size]

sport, not math...covell is part of sport, so yeh its for you covell worshippers.

 

[Bookie]

*hysterically searches for Covells maths reports*

[size=+5]Covell[/size].

 

[shortygb]

jeeez brogan thats enough already...thats 3 threads with the same message!

 

[kimi]

Thats it. Im boycotting these threads until i see no more maths associated. Fuckkk you all. :uhhuh: :uhhuh:
















oh and also, COVELL IS A WANKER. COVELL IS A WANKER. COVELL IS A WANKER. kekeke? :uhhuh:


In other news, Adrian Morley is so hotttt right now.

That is all.