Why is 0≥1? (1 Viewer)

HeroicPandas

Heroic!
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
1,547
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Why is 0≥1?

I was working on a mathematical induction question and got stuck. I started to work backwards and ended up with this...
 

integral95

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
779
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Crap i don't remember how to do a formal proof
 

HeroicPandas

Heroic!
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
1,547
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Let predicate P(n) be ".."

Basis: For n=1, ...

Induction: suppose that k in positive integers
Suppose that P(k) is true

i.e. √1 + √2 + ... + √k ≥ 2/3 k√k

We want to deduce that P(k+1) is true

i.e. √1 + √2 + ... + √k + √(k+1) ≥ 2/3 (k+1)√(k+1)

We have

√1 + √2 + ... + √k + √(k+1)
≥ 2/3 k√k + √(k+1)
≥ 2/3 k√k + 2/3 √(k+1)



Discovery: our aim now is to prove that


Subtract both sides by 1 and combine square roots


Divide both sides by k and square both sides after


Multiply both sides by {k+1) as it is positive and then subtract both sides by k



OK that RED PART is a mistake, and the rest is wrong
 
Last edited:

SpiralFlex

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
6,960
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
Let predicate P(n) be ".."

Basis: For n=1, ...

Induction: suppose that k in positive integers
Suppose that P(k) is true

i.e. √1 + √2 + ... + √k ≥ 2/3 k√k

We want to deduce that P(k+1) is true

i.e. √1 + √2 + ... + √k + √(k+1) ≥ 2/3 (k+1)√(k+1)

We have

√1 + √2 + ... + √k + √(k+1)
≥ 2/3 k√k + √(k+1)



Our aim now is to prove that:

A few assumptions are circularity in the proof
 

SpiralFlex

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
6,960
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
First of all after you say: "Our aim is to prove that", how did you go from that to the line below? Subtract 1 and say the square of the fraction is greater than the previous fraction?
 
Last edited:

HeroicPandas

Heroic!
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
1,547
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
First of all after you say: "Our aim is to prove that", how did you go from that to the line below? Subtract 1 and say the square of the fraction is greater than the previous fraction?

Counterexample when k = 1/3, the claim is false
Sorry, was a typo
 

SpiralFlex

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
6,960
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
By your method if you fix up the error, it should factor out nicely.
 

SpiralFlex

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
6,960
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
Does dividing both sides by k for this question mean that k=0........?



I have just edited my post
But you are assuming the truth of the inequality you are trying to prove. Let k = 1, is the inequality true?
 

SpiralFlex

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
6,960
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A





You should be good to go from here.













 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top