Why is red light deviated more than violet light in diffraction grating? (1 Viewer)

Momentazeus

Active Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2020
Messages
127
Gender
Male
HSC
2022
So I know that the angle of diffraction is greater but how would you explain it in terms of the equation dsin0 = m(lambda). The issue I am having is that d is constant, red wavelength is greater but then when I rearrange for 0, I know that the angle domain is 0-90 so I can explain it through that but the m is the confusing part. The respective values of m would be different for red and violet right? If so, red's m would be greater and so would I just assume that it is an integer greater than the value of violet's m?
 

ssoans

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2021
Messages
86
Gender
Male
HSC
2022
in the double-slit equation, m refers to the number of maxima from the central maximum

so an m value of 2 would refer to the second maxima from the middle

1663819707925.png
* second maximum in this diagram

an m value of 3 for a red wavelength (third maximum) would be much further away than an m value of 1 (first maximum) for the violet wavelength

thus, when measuring the deviance, m should be the same value for both red and violet wavelengths ~ otherwise the measurements would be quite unfair

now, knowing that both m and d are constants, the only variable is the different wavelengths, implying that the greater deviance of a red wavelength is due to its larger wavelength



(an example)

rearranging the formula,

m λ / d = sin θ

let m = 1 ~ (the first maxima from the central maximum)

and d = 0.05


for the red wavelength ~~ sin θ = (620*10^-9)/0.05

whilst

for a violet wavlength ~~ sin θ = (380*10^-9)/0.05


thus, θ for the red wavelength (as calculated) is larger than the violet wavelength,
telling us that the red light diffracted more than the violet light

hope this helps!!
 

bruhwth

New Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2022
Messages
28
Gender
Male
HSC
2022
dsin@ = mλ

Tan@ = y/L , where y is the distance between two successive bright or dark bands and L is the distance between the slits and the screen

At small angles of @ Tan@ = Sin@ roughly

Hence, dy/L = mλ

d, L and m are constant (let m=1 for both)

Therefore you get the following relationship between wavelength and y: y proportional to λ.

Another way to show the relationship, but definitely ssoans' method is perfect for more quantitative responses.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top