It depends on how good you are in maths. Cambridge has a good explanation and some decent questions. Fitzpatrick doesnt explains this that well but still good enough i guess. His questions jump straight into the deep end. Fitzpatrick cost more than cambridge by $10. If you are below avg in maths>>get cambridge. If you understand maths and can do most questions form math in focus, then get fitzpatrick.
Thanks, I'll learn the content in class through our normal textbooks and I'll purchase fitzpatrick for the questions. ^^Cambridge has too many questions and most of it are repetitive. I like fitzpatrick better.
3U Mathematics by J.B. Fitzpatrick. And unfortunately no worked solutions.Thanks, I'll learn the content in class through our normal textbooks and I'll purchase fitzpatrick for the questions. ^^
EDIT: What is the actual name for the fitzpatrick maths 3u texbook (title + author) so I can call up a bookstore and ask them to search for the price and stock available? Also, does it have worked solutions for questions?
Thanks, according to Dymocks... its $90+... Is it just because Dymocks rips people off?3U Mathematics by J.B. Fitzpatrick. And unfortunately no worked solutions.
lol yeh I like the front cover because its got an integration question on it and I love that topic. Maybe that's why you like it =Dyeah fitz is the way to go! i like the cover of it i dont know why ..
You're not supposed to do all the questions (this is stated in the foreword of the textbook itself). The first set of questions in each exercise are repetitive but youll find that the ones near the end are pretty creative.Cambridge has too many questions and most of it are repetitive. I like fitzpatrick better.
I'm selling mine second hand for $30. Not that I don't want to support the writers, but trust me you want to go second hand.yes what the.. i went today im pretty sure it was around 70?