MedVision ad

x^2 = 2^x (1 Viewer)

onebytwo

Recession '08
Joined
Apr 19, 2006
Messages
823
Location
inner west
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
does any have any idea how to solve for x.
the only thing i can think of is taking the natural log of both sides, but from then i get stuck
thanks

i know that two solutions are 2 and 4 but i cant work out the third one
 
Last edited:

A l

Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2004
Messages
625
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Solve graphically using intersections of y = x² and y = 2x?
 

Riviet

.
Joined
Oct 11, 2005
Messages
5,593
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
You could apply Newton's method to make an accurate approximation. By trial and error on the calculator, I got a value of about -0.77.
 

Riviet

.
Joined
Oct 11, 2005
Messages
5,593
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Well I got it off a random e-mail from a friend, thought it was interesting. :)
 

Mill

Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2003
Messages
256
Gender
Male
HSC
2002
theres some sort of theorem on this

i believe there are no other solutions ?

u can show that 2^n > n^2 for n > 4 etcz by induction ETCCZZZZ
 

alcalder

Just ask for help
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Messages
601
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
N/A
If you graph it, there is a third solution with -1 < x < -0.75

Newton's method seems the best way to get there. Then show 2^n>n^2 for all n>4 and 2^n<n^2 for all n<-1.
 
Last edited:

Affinity

Active Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Messages
2,062
Location
Oslo
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2003
IF x > 0
the equation is same as:
2*ln(x) = x*ln(2)

so if you think a bit, would have up to 2 solutions.

now x=2 or 4 are solutions hence only solutions.

correction..
if x is negative, that equation becomes (where y = -x)
(-y)^2 = 2^(-y)
y^2 = 1/2^y

2ln(y) = -y*ln(2)

then you use numerical methods to get y
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top