Students helping students, join us in improving Bored of Studies by donating and supporting future students!
just one Q, with this question, did you know to expand the binomials (evetnually leading to a quadratic in x^2) or just tried it in an attempt to answer the Q?
think of the graph of y = tan xThanks jetblack, it makes alot of sense to me now.
But 1 question though... Where did you get the tan(pi/10) < tan(pi/4) ?
Thanks
I believe you can just say: "by inspection". Or just say: "using calculator".But 1 question though... Where did you get the tan(pi/10) < tan(pi/4) ?
Just to make note, there is a problem at m = 5 since z = 2i tan 5π/10 is undefined.
Will do last part after dinner.
That's interesting. I'm just unsure how to rectify it....Just to make note, there is a problem at m = 5 since z = 2i tan 5π/10 is undefined.
Well from the fact that it contained tan pi/10, it was obvious that the root from one of the previous parts came into it. I just worked from there.just one Q, with this question, did you know to expand the binomials (evetnually leading to a quadratic in x^2) or just tried it in an attempt to answer the Q?
well i realised that part, but did u know that um erWell from the fact that it contained tan pi/10, it was obvious that the root from one of the previous parts came into it. I just worked from there.
Well there was really nothing else to do.well i realised that part, but did u know that um er
i dunno how to explain myself, dw![]()
jetblack does this, however by saying z=2iTan(pi/10) you assume a value for theta, hence can simply sub the theta value into the RHS and find when Cos(5@) = 0. I think doing the expansion would take too long but would show it's a root yesHi again,
Just 1 last question. For part (ii) couldn't I just sub z=2itan(pi/10) to show that it satisfies the equation, which proves that it's a root?
Thanks
Same thingWell, if I sub z=2itanpi/10, then I can just use the result from part (i), which yields zero. Nothing too hard about that lol.