just one Q, with this question, did you know to expand the binomials (evetnually leading to a quadratic in x^2) or just tried it in an attempt to answer the Q?
think of the graph of y = tan xThanks jetblack, it makes alot of sense to me now.
But 1 question though... Where did you get the tan(pi/10) < tan(pi/4) ?
Thanks
I believe you can just say: "by inspection". Or just say: "using calculator".But 1 question though... Where did you get the tan(pi/10) < tan(pi/4) ?
Just to make note, there is a problem at m = 5 since z = 2i tan 5π/10 is undefined.
Will do last part after dinner.
That's interesting. I'm just unsure how to rectify it....Just to make note, there is a problem at m = 5 since z = 2i tan 5π/10 is undefined.
Well from the fact that it contained tan pi/10, it was obvious that the root from one of the previous parts came into it. I just worked from there.just one Q, with this question, did you know to expand the binomials (evetnually leading to a quadratic in x^2) or just tried it in an attempt to answer the Q?
well i realised that part, but did u know that um erWell from the fact that it contained tan pi/10, it was obvious that the root from one of the previous parts came into it. I just worked from there.
Well there was really nothing else to do.well i realised that part, but did u know that um er
i dunno how to explain myself, dw
jetblack does this, however by saying z=2iTan(pi/10) you assume a value for theta, hence can simply sub the theta value into the RHS and find when Cos(5@) = 0. I think doing the expansion would take too long but would show it's a root yesHi again,
Just 1 last question. For part (ii) couldn't I just sub z=2itan(pi/10) to show that it satisfies the equation, which proves that it's a root?
Thanks
Same thingWell, if I sub z=2itanpi/10, then I can just use the result from part (i), which yields zero. Nothing too hard about that lol.