nerdsforever
hsc zomg
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2008
- Messages
- 464
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2010
Re: How did people go in the maths comp today?
damn, I put (c) for question 18
damn, I put (c) for question 18
By inspection:Yes, YOU'RE MY MAN! =] Not sure bout how I went on some of the other qs....
also that parabola was dodgy... I was originally thinking that it was a difference of two squares (it looked like the roots/zeroes were equal negative) - but then again never trust scale.
25/9, how did half your class get that one wrong?By inspection:
a < 0
0 < c
b = 0
a + b < c [summing them]
a + b - c < 0
LOL, what did u guys put for question 4? Half my class got it wrong![]()
Lol, you should have done the cheap way and folded paper or somethingI got the map one wrong, so no hard feelings xD
It's a red herring I guess, just throws people off when they get too cocky.25/9, how did half your class get that one wrong?![]()
Those are reducibleq 25) for the f(x) n-fold question i'm sure the answer was 2
for fn(x) = x
Linear/linear=x
making a quadratic resulting in 2 solutions
e.g. (x + 6)/x = x
x^2=x+6
X^2 - x - 6 =0
(x-3)(x+2)=0
two solution x=3, -2
q 18) Answer is 4, i think
Find the numbers which multiply to become 60 (2 numbers only)
2 and 30
3 and 20
6 and 10
15 and 4
5 and 12
1 and 60
Using reciprocals you will get three to have 60 as the denominator
e.g. 2/30 + 30/2 = ....
6/10 + 10/6 = .....
Bleh, I know! What mark you aiming for official?Lol, you should have done the cheap way and folded paper or something
80 but I think I got somewhere around 75Bleh, I know! What mark you aiming for official?
I think i'm capped at 75, so I suppose i'll aim for that xD80 but I think I got somewhere around 75
how bout you?
Lolokay got 48. Drawing a net helps with these types of questions.For 28 did anyone get 27?
q 28 is the regular octahedron shape with 6cm edges
The last 3 were so hard, didn't even bother with them after reading them over.Does anybody have an idea for the q30? Knowing the properties of 2009 didn't seem to help me much >< and 28 was obscure, possibly poor wording/ comprehension...
I was really close to the last one but the "no congruence" nugget was a kick in the balls.The last 3 were so hard, didn't even bother with them after reading them over.
haha, I was reading the question and when the question stated the number "2009" I was just like, I'm not wasting my time thereI was really close to the last one but the "no congruence" nugget was a kick in the balls.