MedVision ad

MX1 Independent Trial Results (1 Viewer)

untouchablecuz

Active Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
1,693
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
for comparisons sake, how did everyone go?

i got 73/84; didn't do as well as i had hoped, way too many silly mistakes
 

lychnobity

Active Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2008
Messages
1,292
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2009
for comparisons sake, how did everyone go?

i got 73/84; didn't do as well as i had hoped, way too many silly mistakes
Eh, I got a modified version (much easier than the actual one). But if I get extra marks, I'll be looking at ~96%
 

Thecorey0

Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2008
Messages
428
Location
Goldstein
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
78/84. Quite disappointed with the result, as I had done silly mistakes - like for the inverse graph thing I forgot to write the coordinates for one of the end points. Paper was easy though. Not too bad for a non 4-unit'er either, and the fact the class consists of 1.
 

Timothy.Siu

Prophet 9
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
3,449
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
78/84. Quite disappointed with the result, as I had done silly mistakes - like for the inverse graph thing I forgot to write the coordinates for one of the end points. Paper was easy though. Not too bad for a non 4-unit'er either, and the fact the class consists of 1.
very nice indeed.
 

lyounamu

Reborn
Joined
Oct 28, 2007
Messages
9,998
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
I would love to see how the paper is like in comparison to CSSA.

Can anyone post up the paper if it is allowe/
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top