Integration question (1 Viewer)

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A


Then let u = tan theta

Then continue from there.

Alternatively for that same integral, you could use Integration by Parts, making the choices:

 

dulip

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2010
Messages
38
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
thanks, i'm finding it hard to know when/what to substitute
any tips?
also anyone able to help on the 2nd question (i linked it because it didn't post properly when i copied it)
 

jet

Banned
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Messages
3,148
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Well in this case, it's priority to remove the annoying square root, so carrotsticks got smart and let u2 = stuff inside the square root. There's a good chance this will get rid of it.

I honestly have no idea how junatheron chose his substitution because I've never seen it done that way before.

I'll do the next question later if nobody else has done it by then.
 

Drongoski

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
4,255
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Just saw this question


By inspection:







Did I make a mistake somewhere?
 
Last edited:

bleakarcher

Active Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2011
Messages
1,509
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
just one question. say you used the substitution x=sec^2(theta) would you end up in the denominator with abs[tan(theta)] or just tan(theta)?

I stumbled across this thought the other day. 4U Cambridge just tells me tan(theta).
 

jet

Banned
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Messages
3,148
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
Square root means positive square root, hence you don't need the absolute value.
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Square root means positive square root, hence you don't need the absolute value.
I would think thats WHY abs value signs would be necessary. Say you were integrating over an interval where tan is negative...I remember Cambridge not doing this though so I don't know what the BOS expect.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top