Ah cool, although I prefer the original approach lolok what I did was differentiate everything 3 times (lol).
This left me with no ln(x) and the only 'x' left were in the denominator.
So by subbing in stuff like x=1, I ended up with a few different equations in terms of a, b, and c only. Then just use simultaneous equations.
Not sure if this was actually shorter though lol.
yeah my badWell my point is you don't use implicit in 2U...
True, that method isn't actually that long, however we were just looking for faster/alternative ways I guessMaybe the original way seemed longer because you didn't get it straight away?
I mean it's not really that long......
Just out of curiosity, Do the students usually do well where uu get tutored?True, that method isn't actually that long, however we were just looking for faster/alternative ways I guess
Most of them, I guess so? It's an accelerated class and there's quite a number of really smart geniuses.Just out of curiosity, Do the students usually do well where uu get tutored?
Like you. BTW, I'm a bit disappointed I didn't really talk to you on Wed- you said hi at the start and then I got distracted and didn't come back sorryMost of them, I guess so? It's an accelerated class and there's quite a number of really smart geniuses.
haha, not really (compared to everyone else here)Like you. BTW, I'm a bit disappointed I didn't really talk to you on Wed- you said hi at the start and then I got distracted and didn't come back sorry