This method works (without complex numbers)Hint: write 2x2 as 4x2 - 2x2
To be fair I've seen this question several times before and the answer sorta gives it away (notice it can expand as a difference of two squares)This method works (without complex numbers)
Just wondering what made you think of using it (seems very useful)
Its extension 1. OP has to understand Trebla's method, unless OP is doing ext.2View attachment 29584 Trebla's method is like 500 times easier but if you couldn't see it, then here is the solution using complex numbers.
This method works (without complex numbers)
Just wondering what made you think of using it (seems very useful)
It's very similar to the method of completing the square. You can think of it as:Wow very nice trebla
Pls tell us the origins of that neat idea
It IS completing the square - the original expression has been written as the sum/difference of two terms that can be interpreted as perfect squares - exactly what completing the square involves. Its just that most people are used to seeing only the standard question types.It's very similar to the method of completing the square.