HSC 2012-14 MX2 Integration Marathon (archive) (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

hit patel

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2012
Messages
568
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2018
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

Let u= x^(n-2) du = (n-2)x^(n-3)
dv = x^2 (sqrt(1-x^3)) v= -(2/9) (1-x^3)^(3/2)

Un= (-(2/9)(1-x^3)^(3/2)x^(n-2))_1_0 +(2/9)(n-2) integral_1_0 ((1-x^3)^(3/2)(x^(n-3))
= 0 + 2/9 (n-2) (2/9)(n-2) (integral_1_0 ( (1-x^3)^(1/2))(1-x^3) x^(n-2)))
=(2/9)(n-2)[ integral _1_0 ((1-x^3)^(1/2) (x^(n-3)) - integral _1_0 (x^(n) ((1-x^3)^(1/2))]
=2/9 (n-2) (U_(n-3)-U_(n))
Rearranging (taking the U_n to the other side with its coefficient)
((2n+3)/9)U_(n)= (2/9)(n-2) (U_(n-3))
Simplifying U_n = ((2n-4)/(2n+3)) U_(n-3))
but n is not greater than or equal to 4. since U_(n-3) and n-3 > 0 but I dont know why it is greater than or equal to 5.
Sorry if you had to take a long time to read it (if you did read it).
 

Davo_01

Active Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
116
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

Let u= x^(n-2) du = (n-2)x^(n-3)
dv = x^2 (sqrt(1-x^3)) v= -(2/9) (1-x^3)^(3/2)

Un= (-(2/9)(1-x^3)^(3/2)x^(n-2))_1_0 +(2/9)(n-2) integral_1_0 ((1-x^3)^(3/2)(x^(n-3))
= 0 + 2/9 (n-2) (2/9)(n-2) (integral_1_0 ( (1-x^3)^(1/2))(1-x^3) x^(n-2)))
=(2/9)(n-2)[ integral _1_0 ((1-x^3)^(1/2) (x^(n-3)) - integral _1_0 (x^(n) ((1-x^3)^(1/2))]
=2/9 (n-2) (U_(n-3)-U_(n))
Rearranging (taking the U_n to the other side with its coefficient)
((2n+3)/9)U_(n)= (2/9)(n-2) (U_(n-3))
Simplifying U_n = ((2n-4)/(2n+3)) U_(n-3))
but n is not greater than or equal to 4. since U_(n-3) and n-3 > 0 but I dont know why it is greater than or equal to 5.
Sorry if you had to take a long time to read it (if you did read it).
On the 8th line u made a tiny mistake, 1+2(n-2)/9=(2n+5)/9 instead of (2n+3)/9

As for the n greater than equal to 5, it is not as easy to integrate I_1 as compared to integrating I_2, thats probably why.
 

hit patel

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2012
Messages
568
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2018
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

On the 8th line u made a tiny mistake, 1+2(n-2)/9=(2n+5)/9 instead of (2n+3)/9

As for the n greater than equal to 5, it is not as easy to integrate I_1 as compared to integrating I_2, thats probably why.
Sorry for the mistake. Oh ok I though that but I though it should work so I discarded that thought.
 

Davo_01

Active Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
116
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

Sorry for the mistake. Oh ok I though that but I though it should work so I discarded that thought.
Yeh the formula should work even for n>=3 but to end up with and integral we can easily evaluate, we would want to sub a number in the form n=3k+2
 

hit patel

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2012
Messages
568
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2018
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

LET M BE the INTEGRAL PROVIDED.
Let u^2= 1+4x (u.du)/2 = dx when x=6, u= 5 when x= 2 u= 3
Integral _5_3((ln(-1+u) -ln2) u.du/2)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Let integral _5 _3 (u.ln(u-1))= I
For I,
Let y= ln (u-1) dy=1/(u-1)
Let dz= u z= (u^2)/2
therefore I= [((u^2)/2)ln(u-1)]_5_3 - integral ((u^2)/2(u-1))_5 _3
= (41/2)ln(2) - integral (u + u/(u-1))_5_3
= 20ln(2) -5
-----------------------------------------------
M= (1/2) (20ln(2)-5) - 4ln(2) = 6 ln(2) - 5/2

____________________________________________________________________
Sorry for the messy work. Possibly and probably some mistakes due to bracketing problems that I faced.
 
Last edited:

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

LET M BE the INTEGRAL PROVIDED.
Let u^2= 1+4x (u.du)/2 = dx when x=6, u= 5 when x= 2 u= 3
Integral _5_3((ln(-1+u) -ln2) u.du/2)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Let integral _5 _3 (u.ln(u-1))= I
For I,
Let y= ln (u-1) dy=1/(u-1)
Let dz= u z= (u^2)/2
therefore I= [((u^2)/2)ln(u-1)]_5_3 - integral ((u^2)/2(u-1))_5 _3
= (41/2)ln(2) - integral (u - u/(u-1))_5_3
= (41/2)ln(2) - 6 + ln (3/5)
-----------------------------------------------
M= (41/2)ln(2) -6 + ln (3/5) -16 ln (2) = (9/2)ln(2) + ln(3/5) -6

____________________________________________________________________
Sorry for the messy work. Possibly and probably some mistakes due to bracketing problems that I faced.
I think you have made a mistake
 

hit patel

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2012
Messages
568
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2018
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

LET M BE the INTEGRAL PROVIDED.
Let u^2= 1+4x (u.du)/2 = dx when x=6, u= 5 when x= 2 u= 3
Integral _5_3((ln(-1+u) -ln2) u.du/2)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Let integral _5 _3 (u.ln(u-1))= I
For I,
Let y= ln (u-1) dy=1/(u-1)
Let dz= u z= (u^2)/2
therefore I= [((u^2)/2)ln(u-1)]_5_3 - integral ((u^2)/2(u-1))_5 _3
= (41/2)ln(2) - integral (u - u/(u-1))_5_3
= (41/2)ln(2) - 6 + ln (3/5)
-----------------------------------------------
M= (41/2)ln(2) -6 + ln (3/5) -16 ln (2) = (9/2)ln(2) + ln(3/5) -6

____________________________________________________________________
Sorry for the messy work. Possibly and probably some mistakes due to bracketing problems that I faced.
Used curve sketching to draw the graph found an approximate area to find integral. Answer way off and got a negative answer that doesnt correspond to the answer I got.
 

Davo_01

Active Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
116
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

6ln2-5/2? Just use u=ln(...) And hence x=e^u+e^2u then IBP
 
Last edited:

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

Think i fixed it.
Yep that is correct.

The method I had in mind was recognising that the argument inside the logarithm looks like a solution to a quadratic equation, namely



So it makes sense then to just make the substitution







Then simple by parts from there
 

hit patel

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2012
Messages
568
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2018
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

Yep that is correct.

The method I had in mind was recognising that the argument inside the logarithm looks like a solution to a quadratic equation, namely



So it makes sense then to just make the substitution







Then simple by parts from there
Oh ok. I didnt see that. I have never seen anyone use that. That a really great method. Cant rep. I would If i could.
 

hit patel

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2012
Messages
568
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2018
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

1) sin (2n+1)x = sin (2n-1 +2)x
= sin(2n-1)x cos(2x) - cos(2n-1)xsin(2x)
= sin (2n-1)x (1-2sin^(2) x) - cos (2n-1)x(2cosxsinx)
Expanding we get:
sin (2n-1)x - 2sin(2n-1)xsin^(2)x + 2cos(2n-1)xsinxcosx
Now sin(2n+1)x/sinx = sin (2n-1)x / sin(x) - 2sin (2n-1)xsinx + 2cos(2n-1)xcosx
But this consists of cos(a+b)
Therefore = sin (2n-1)x/sin (x) -2 cos(2nx)
Integral _pi/2_0 sin (2(n-1)+1)x/sin(x) -2cos(2nx) dx

= U_(n-1) + 2 [ sin(2nx)/2n] _ pi/2_0
= U_(n-1)

huh? now? Looks like I did something wrong. how can integral of u_n be equal to u_(n-1) hm? and how do I continue .
isnt 2n-1 always odd in my answer therefore i get 1 as answer/

And also any other quicker ways. This way took me a long time to think of because first time I did it I expanded straight away. Then thought about the ways I could integrate and saw that the only way I could do this and get rid of the sinx at bottom was by using double angle formula so yeh I had to go through a long process. Any other shorter methods?
 
Last edited:

RealiseNothing

what is that?It is Cowpea
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
4,591
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

1) sin (2n+1)x = sin (2n-1 +2)x
= sin(2n-1)x cos(2x) - cos(2n-1)xsin(2x)
= sin (2n-1)x (1-2sin^(2) x) - cos (2n-1)x(2cosxsinx)
Expanding we get:
sin (2n-1)x - 2sin(2n-1)xsin^(2)x + 2cos(2n-1)xsinxcosx
Now sin(2n+1)x/sinx = sin (2n-1)x / sin(x) - 2sin (2n-1)xsinx + 2cos(2n-1)xcosx
But this consists of cos(a+b)
Therefore = sin (2n-1)x/sin (x) -2 cos(2nx)
Integral _pi/2_0 sin (2(n-1)+1)x/sin(x) -2cos(2nx) dx

= U_(n-1) + 2 [ sin(2nx)/2n] _ pi/2_0
= U_(n-1)

huh? now? Looks like I did something wrong. how can integral of u_n be equal to u_(n-1) hm? and how do I continue .
isnt 2n-1 always odd in my answer therefore i get 1 as answer/






 

hit patel

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2012
Messages
568
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Uni Grad
2018
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

Hahahah what so I actually had the answer the whole time and I went through all that. Hahaha I used that fact you just showed in the answer I wrote. Look at the bottom of my answer. What was I thinking? But shouldnt I still get the same answer?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top