HSC 2012-14 MX2 Integration Marathon (archive) (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ikki

Active Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
130
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

The usual dividing top and bottom by cos works well here.




Let u=tanx







And yeh i run into a problem roundabout here as you know tanpi/2=infinity.

Attempting to solve between the limits...







Not sure if legit.
 
Last edited:

dunjaaa

Active Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2012
Messages
473
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

trying to think of another way of doing this without involving substitution
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

The usual dividing top and bottom by cos works well here.




Let u=tanx







And yeh i run into a problem roundabout here as you know tanpi/2=infinity.

Attempting to solve between the limits...







Not sure if legit.
Yep that's what I did.
 

Shadowdude

Cult of Personality
Joined
Sep 19, 2009
Messages
12,146
Gender
Male
HSC
2010
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

Attempting to solve between the limits...





.
This part of the solution makes me cry. I'm literally cringing right now...


(substitute n in, and take the limit as n to infinity)
 

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

This part of the solution makes me cry. I'm literally cringing right now...


(substitute n in, and take the limit as n to infinity)
Haha me too, I felt pretty uncomfortable seeing it.
 

Kurosaki

True Fail Kid
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
1,168
Location
Tubbytronic Superdome
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon



You would probably have to deal with cases of
Shouldn't that, uh, just be integrating from 0 to ? So then can't you (not sure what the proper term is) split up the interval of integration in a more intervals then evaluate each one? Or just, uh evaluate from 0 to and from there multiply by 2?

Edit: Is it ?
Edit 2: It should actually be . (ignore the above integral)
We can then draw a graph and notice the 'symmetry' (not sure if this is the correct term) about x= in the interval of integration, so we can simplify this integral to
 
Last edited:

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

Shouldn't that, uh, just be integrating from 0 to ? So then can't you (not sure what the proper term is) split up the interval of integration in a more intervals then evaluate each one? Or just, uh evaluate from 0 to and from there multiply by 4?

Edit: Is it ?
Yep that is what I got.
 

Ikki

Active Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
130
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

On the third last line it's meant to be a u not x but other than that thanks :)

@SYAMAN: Brah that frog is so distracting LOL.
 

Ikki

Active Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
130
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon



But i feel i remember doing something like this before, and its not that straight forward... Nope it seems about legit.

Hey guys how do u guys do the integration brackets?
 
Last edited:

trapizi

╰(゜Д゜)╯
Joined
Sep 8, 2013
Messages
429
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

^
Sorry mate wrong answer
 

Kurosaki

True Fail Kid
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
1,168
Location
Tubbytronic Superdome
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon



But i feel i remember doing something like this before, and its not that straight forward... Nope it seems about legit.

Hey guys how do u guys do the integration brackets?
It's not 0, the reason is because the graph is |sin(x)|. So what you do is draw a graph, calculate a single interval and multiply.
Leading on from your working, the integral is . Notice that the same pattern repeats for every , n being integral values, when graphing.
Then we can simplify this to . Integrating, we find ?
 
Last edited:

Ikki

Active Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
130
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

when do you know the simplification is to be |absolute| ?

Ah I get it now, but... Why wouldn't it be 2014 not 4028 in front of the integral? If you say for example take the boundaries between 0 and 4pi. The integral of 0 to pi multiplied by 4 is the solution for sinx.
Therefore final solution 4028sqrt(2)?

EDIT: Oh k cool you changed it
 

Kurosaki

True Fail Kid
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
1,168
Location
Tubbytronic Superdome
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

when do you know the simplification is to be |absolute| ?

Ah I get it now, but... Why wouldn't it be 2014 not 4028 in front of the integral? If you say for example take the boundaries between 0 and 4pi. The integral of 0 to pi multiplied by 4 is the solution for sinx.
Therefore final solution 4028sqrt(2)?

EDIT: Oh k cool you changed it
When you do something like, say, , it's not equal to x, it's |x|. You can examine this by using values for x<0
Edit: I realised I didn't actually answer your question. Hmmm, generally when there is a square root, you should start thinking absolute value, unless it's obvious that in the interval of integration, it won't be required, e.g. the one we just did, but with bounds from 0 to
 
Last edited:

trapizi

╰(゜Д゜)╯
Joined
Sep 8, 2013
Messages
429
Gender
Male
HSC
2014
Re: MX2 Integration Marathon

Nice. There is another way using this integration method:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top