taking time vs. rushing (1 Viewer)

[Joshmosh2]

It has become increasingly apparent to me that accelerants generally do better than normal math students. So, I thought that learning content at an earlier stage would allow more time for concepts to sink in, thus, leading to a better outcome.

my question is:
What is better? - Learning content thoroughly, but at a slow pace OR Rushing way ahead of content, but only a brief understanding

I am moving at a slow pace atm, and still with brief understanding... might experiment with the 'rush' method

 

[aDimitri]

It has become increasingly apparent to me that accelerants generally do better than normal math students. So, I thought that learning content at an earlier stage would allow more time for concepts to sink in, thus, leading to a better outcome.

my question is:
What is better? - Learning content thoroughly, but at a slow pace OR Rushing way ahead of content, but only a brief understanding

I am moving at a slow pace atm, and still with brief understanding... might experiment with the 'rush' method

slowly

 

[BLIT2014]

Accelerants do better because
i) Have less subjects to focus on
ii) Tend to have to be decent at Mathematics/other subject to get the offer to accelerate

And Learning content thoroughly but slowly is better for retention..