2017 HSC Mathematics Paper thoughts (2 Viewers)

pikachu975

Premium Member
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
2,739
Location
NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2017
Some one please send link to the paper thanks.
NESA doesn't allow posting of their papers as they have copyright I've read on another forum but they post the paper fast, should be there tmrw
 

boredofstudiesuser1

Active Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2016
Messages
570
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2018
It was fine tbh. Lost 7 marks defs for the last two qs and the find x for sin a = sin b qs. Hope I get 85+ fml
For the Sina = sinb I'm pretty sure you just had to have them equal each other and then I got something like 3.75m.

Not sure if anyone found an easier way, but for the proof, I said that Sina was O/H for its triangle (did the same for sinb) and then differentiated - and got the result.

Easier way to do it? It was a tedious differentiation for 2 marks.. (if I remembered correctly)
 

xern7777

New Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2017
Messages
1
Gender
Male
HSC
2017
What did everyone get for the values of 'a' in the limiting sum = 2 question?? I got 0<a<4 but not sure
This is still subject to review, but apparently a GP with r=0 cannot exist to form a limiting sum of 2, as a=2 for that to occur. Thus your series is 2+0+0+0+0,..... Term2/Term1=0/2=0 but Term3/Term2=0/0=undefined. So a GP must have a non-zero common ration, if 'a' is a non-zero number. Which means the answer may be 0<a<4, a is not equal to 2 (when r=0). Pretty sure this question was designed to trick the state though, so I'm not sure how they'll receive it in the marking center. But it is 3 marks, so other than rearrange the question or graphing/determining the range for 2 marks, the other one is likely gained by recognizing the restriction.

The only case where a zero GP may exist is when 'a'=0 i.e. 0,0,0,0,... which doesn't provide a limiting sum of 2.
 
Joined
Mar 14, 2016
Messages
1
Gender
Male
HSC
2017
The exam was easier in comparison to past years, only question that would have thrown people was limiting sum and geo proof however from what i hear most got at least 1 mark for identifying or making some progress to the solution.
 

Sxerks3

New Member
Joined
May 2, 2016
Messages
28
Gender
Male
HSC
2017
It wasn't too bad, I'm looking at around 93/94 to 96 raw, depending on how harshly they mark it.
Screwed up the loan repayment, as I put it = 0, instead of 80,000.
Couldn't factorise dL/dx to find x.
Everything else was alright.
 

1729

Active Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
199
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2018
This is still subject to review, but apparently a GP with r=0 cannot exist to form a limiting sum of 2, as a=2 for that to occur. Thus your series is 2+0+0+0+0,..... Term2/Term1=0/2=0 but Term3/Term2=0/0=undefined. So a GP must have a non-zero common ration, if 'a' is a non-zero number. Which means the answer may be 0<a<4, a is not equal to 2 (when r=0). Pretty sure this question was designed to trick the state though, so I'm not sure how they'll receive it in the marking center. But it is 3 marks, so other than rearrange the question or graphing/determining the range for 2 marks, the other one is likely gained by recognizing the restriction.

The only case where a zero GP may exist is when 'a'=0 i.e. 0,0,0,0,... which doesn't provide a limiting sum of 2.
?
 

PARLIAMO314159

New Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2017
Messages
5
Gender
Male
HSC
2017
I'm also wondering this.
Yep, as the mathematics you used to attain either answer is correct, as you rounded to 2 sig figs, and they didn't specify to use the rounded value of k in part iii, i.e., through using the directive 'hence', etc. Essentially, if the method's correct, they'll accept the solution, especially considering that sizeable proportion of the 2017 2u/3u cohort would've answered part iii using the rounded figure.
 

1729

Active Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
199
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2018
This is still subject to review, but apparently a GP with r=0 cannot exist to form a limiting sum of 2, as a=2 for that to occur. Thus your series is 2+0+0+0+0,..... Term2/Term1=0/2=0 but Term3/Term2=0/0=undefined. So a GP must have a non-zero common ration, if 'a' is a non-zero number. Which means the answer may be 0<a<4, a is not equal to 2 (when r=0). Pretty sure this question was designed to trick the state though, so I'm not sure how they'll receive it in the marking center. But it is 3 marks, so other than rearrange the question or graphing/determining the range for 2 marks, the other one is likely gained by recognizing the restriction.

The only case where a zero GP may exist is when 'a'=0 i.e. 0,0,0,0,... which doesn't provide a limiting sum of 2.
The syllabus only places restriction |r| < 1 for limiting sum
 

shehan123

Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2016
Messages
30
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
The syllabus only places restriction |r| < 1 for limiting sum
This is true, we never go over the case of R=0, but then the man spits a good point, 3 marks for that 0 < a < 4 seems a little dodgy.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top