MX2 Integration Marathon (5 Viewers)

Qeru

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2020
Messages
368
Gender
Male
HSC
2021
It does look like it doesn’t it! Jkjk
In reality, I really only like integration now because there is a certain elegance to it and skill required (and it’s still fresh in my head). I find the rest of maths quite boring and stale imho. My attempts at the above integrals are really just due to boredom (not long till uni starts now though).
Doesn't look like you were bored of maths considering you got a 99 for 4U. There had to be some interest there lol
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,642
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
The ultimate tedious integral:

This can easily be converted to a much more recognisable integral with the substitution:



From which it follows that:



and the problem is reduced to a very (very) messy partial fractions problem. According to the integral calculator, and after cleaning up its awful formatting / presentation, the indefinite integral is:







 

stupid_girl

Active Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
221
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
I wrote this in the past but I have now forgotten how to solve it.


Edit: I remember how to solve it now. 😈
 
Last edited:

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,642
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
I wrote this in the past but I have now forgotten how to solve it.
Is the question here to prove this result - i.e. that the integral is 1 irrespective of the value of k - or is this an equation that needs to be solved to find the value(s) of k?
 

stupid_girl

Active Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
221
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Is the question here to prove this result - i.e. that the integral is 1 irrespective of the value of k - or is this an equation that needs to be solved to find the value(s) of k?
The integral is 1 irrespective of the value of k.
 

Qeru

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2020
Messages
368
Gender
Male
HSC
2021
can you post the solution here? This gives me a headache for the last few days :(
Yeah lol, some factoring trick I imagine, or King Rule but I dont see how that is used.
 

stupid_girl

Active Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
221
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
can you post the solution here? This gives me a headache for the last few days :(
What tricks have you tried?

The following techniques are NOT required. 😈
integration by parts
differentiation under the integral sign
hyperbolic function
 

s97127

Active Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2018
Messages
303
Gender
Male
HSC
2020
What tricks have you tried?

The following techniques are NOT required. 😈
integration by parts
differentiation under the integral sign
hyperbolic function
I've tried all the techniques above. I think the problem will be solved by substituting x with another variable t and we got I + I = 2 so I = 1.
Am i on the right path?
 

stupid_girl

Active Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
221
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
By adjusting the coefficient of k to 1, you should be able to take out log_2 (2), which is just 1. Integrating dx from 0 to 1 gives you 1.

The remaining factors have the same structure and you can offset them by suitable substitution.
 

idkkdi

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2019
Messages
2,569
Gender
Male
HSC
2021
By adjusting the coefficient of k to 1, you should be able to take out log_2 (2), which is just 1. Integrating dx from 0 to 1 gives you 1.

The remaining factors have the same structure and you can offset them by suitable substitution.
if ur stupid, what am i.

F
 

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Define



The original question takes the argument a=2.

For brevity, we will suppress the first two arguments⁰, as it turns out they are irrelevant to the final answer.

(This is a thing in higher mathematics lmao get used to it)

The original question is equivalent¹ to:



It is clear that ψ(u,v) = ψ(v,u), from the definition, so we can collapse the first two terms together.

Break off the +1 term and ignore it for now, as that is what gives the final answer.

Using the substitution x = t², the integral becomes:



Using the boundary preserving transformation t→1-t, this becomes:



Use symmetry in u,v, once again, to reorder the arguments to be the same as before.

Take the average of this and the previous step, to obtain:



We consider only the last two terms for now.

Define:



By the same boundary preserving transformation as before, it is obvious that A = B.

Use the scaling transformation t→2t:



Use the same "boundary preserving transformation" to change the interval [0,½] → [½,1]



Finally, we have:



Returning to the step before we defined A and B, we obtain:



The +1 term is trivially integrated to obtain 1, which is the final answer.

⁰ ψ(u,v) = ψ(a,k,u,v)

¹ left as an exercise to the reader
 
Last edited:

Paradoxica

-insert title here-
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
2,556
Location
Outside reality
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
the real answer to this conundrum is that by using a substitution which maps a finite open interval to ℝ, you cannot invert the substitution to obtain an antiderivative valid over all of ℝ. the substitution is only bijective locally, not globally, so a true inverse does not exist, hence the antiderivative is only valid over specific subsets of ℝ. in order to obtain an antiderivative that is valid on all of ℝ, you need a different method.

more to read here:

 

stupid_girl

Active Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
221
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
By the way, choosing the correct substitution is not the end of story.😈

Remember to split the interval.


If you are wondering how these break points are chosen, you may try to graph .
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 5)

Top