Raw Marks 2023 HSC Exams (4 Viewers)

[synthesisFR]

no clue sorry i heard aligning was bad this year tho

 

[qldbulls]

I mean the raw mark to nesa mark I got a examination mark of 90 , do you have any idea what raw mark that would have been

84-85ish

 

[jackarana]

Thanks

 

[synthesisFR]

84-85ish

honestly more like 87

 

[jackarana]

honestly more like 87

Also can they scale down your school mark. On my report for maths advanced it said 96 but on the school mark for nesa it said 94.

 

[synthesisFR]

it wasn't scaled down it was moderated

 

[jackarana]

it wasn't scaled down it was moderated

even if it was selective school , not top but decent

 

[qldbulls]

honestly more like 87

idk I know my ~82 went to 87, b6 cutoff might have been a particular mark not linear with other alignment

 

[scaryshark09]

idk I know my ~82 went to 87, b6 cutoff might have been a particular mark not linear with other alignment

if 82 went to 87, then band 6 cuttoff would be around 86

 

[Ritikthegoat]

Umm idk if this belongs in this thread,but I went from having a internal assessment mark of 89 for english standard to 77 on my hsc , and I'm not bad at english for the trials I got 89%, im not sure if its a nesa error or jus that english standard is shit

 

[jimmysmith560]

Umm idk if this belongs in this thread,but I went from having a internal assessment mark of 89 for english standard to 77, and I'm not bad at english for the trials I got 89%, im not sure if its a nesa error or jus that english standard is shit

The Assessment Mark that you received indicates that your performance and/or that of your cohort in the English Standard HSC exam was of a lower standard (recall the moderation process), hence the mark. This can also mean that the trial exam you sat was less challenging than the HSC exam.

 

[liamkk112]

Umm idk if this belongs in this thread,but I went from having a internal assessment mark of 89 for english standard to 77 on my hsc , and I'm not bad at english for the trials I got 89%, im not sure if its a nesa error or jus that english standard is shit

lol same for me except 88 in trials, my exam mark was 77

idrc bc i got a good atar regardless but i think the way some schools mark english is different to the way nesa marks it, hence difference in results

that being said i couldve just screwed up the english exam which is highly possible lol

shoutout to whoever in my grade got 95 thank u fr (rank 1 came in clutch)

 

[WeiWeiMan]

scaling or aligning
the preliminary scaling 2023 report is out u can check there
@carrotsss will probably be able to interpret the numbers well
its weird i looked at it and scaling looks pretty good similar to 2022 idk like close

isn't scaling almost the same every year for HSC -> Scaled

 

[scaryshark09]

isn't scaling almost the same every year for HSC -> Scaled

yeh it usually is, however there sometimes are big differences such as 2022 with mx1

 

[ariandjabari]

Luckily my EAL/D assessment marks went from a raw 86 to an 89. But for a high scaling subject like Economics, my raw 87 went to 84 so I guess my cohort underperfomed? I know we had at least two 89s and one 87 exam mark and I was rank 3 in my cohort. So idk how I got 84 for assessment marks considering NESA uses ranks (and gaps) to allocate marks. I know the highest assessment mark was 89 but 84 for rank 3 seems a bit too low.

 

[scaryshark09]

Luckily my EAL/D assessment marks went from a raw 86 to an 89. But for a high scaling subject like Economics, my raw 87 went to 84 so I guess my cohort underperfomed? I know we had at least two 89s and one 87 exam mark and I was rank 3 in my cohort. So idk how I got 84 for assessment marks considering NESA uses ranks (and gaps) to allocate marks. I know the highest assessment mark was 89 but 84 for rank 3 seems a bit too low.

84 does seem a bit low, however if the gap was 5%+, then it makes sense

 

[ariandjabari]

84 does seem a bit low, however if the gap was 5%+, then it makes sense

Well rank 1 was around 95 raw assessment and got an 89 so I guess our top people underperformed and brought us down despite at least three people getting 87+ in exam

 

[fx82au]

did anyone else get an email saying their payment didnt go through for the raw marks report?

 

[hayden2402]

did anyone else get an email saying their payment didnt go through for the raw marks report?

Yep but then I tried again and it worked; my bank acc was charged

 

[scaryshark09]

did anyone else get an email saying their payment didnt go through for the raw marks report?

yes i got the same, wasted 6 days