Physics Predictions/Thoughts (1 Viewer)

[English hater]

That would also be interesting, do they teach it in the engineering course? I'm surprised they teach us centripetal force but completely overlook centrifugal force, or they don't even include simple newtonian drag

the most complex thing for fluids in engineering studies is how a wing works, so no

 

[svad]

The content is interesting, but it is not examined properly. We should not have to memorise all the names and dates and experiments

I generally suck at spelling and having to memorise Schrödinger isn't making it any easier

 

[English hater]

I generally suck at spelling and having to memorise Schrödinger isn't making it any easier

but the markers dont care about spelling if it is clsoe enough. it isnt english

 

[svad]

but the markers dont care about spelling if it is clsoe enough. it isnt english

yeah but im just personally embarrassed lol

 

[coolcat6778]

but the markers dont care about spelling if it is clsoe enough. it isnt english

these history questions ARE marked like English. beware.

 

[cheesynooby]

The content is interesting, but it is not examined properly. We should not have to memorise all the names and dates and experiments

u definitely do not need dates, and only know the last names of the scientists

 

[English hater]

these history questions ARE marked like English. beware.

they are not marked like english, they are marked logically

 

[coolcat6778]

they are not marked like english, they are marked logically

then explain why i got almost zero in all of these history questions despite putting in the key points and names?

 

[English hater]

then explain why i got almost zero in all of these history questions despite putting in the key points and names?

send me ur questions and answers in dms, i kinda wanna know? maybe its ur school.

 

[coolcat6778]

send me ur questions and answers in dms, i kinda wanna know? maybe its ur school.

real hsc paper still got mid band 5 after alignment

 

[lucas10champ]

real hsc paper still got mid band 5 after alignment

lol u glaze maths physics so much and only got a band 5 smh

 

[coolcat6778]

lol u glaze maths physics so much and only got a band 5 smh

bro our paper was all writing, everyone who actually did that exam agrees. u also said that there were no hard quantitative questions

 

[lucas10champ]

bro our paper was all writing, everyone who actually did that exam agrees. u also said that there were no hard quantitative questions

now my guy is pulling words out of his ass pls tell me when i said that. Also, my mates said that the paper wasnt that much writing, seems like its just u

 

[coolcat6778]

now my guy is pulling words out of his ass pls tell me when i said that. Also, my mates said that the paper wasnt that much writing, seems like its just u

certainly more writing than the 2019 and 2020, 2022, 2023 papers

 

[lucas10champ]

can u pls remind when i said there were no hard quantitative questions

 

[coolcat6778]

can u pls remind when i said there were no hard quantitative questions

u must've deleted it,

 

[coolcat6778]

pretty sure u said something similar to "there's going to be harder questions that involve thinking cause last year was so easy"

 

[lucas10champ]

nahhhhh u got caught lying red handed why would i delete it, i mean what do u expect from a dumbass that boasts being so good at physics and only gets a band 5

 

[coolcat6778]

nahhhhh u got caught lying red handed why would i delete it, i mean what do u expect from a dumbass that boasts being so good at physics and only gets a band 5

i never boasted about being good at physics lol, i'm just saying yall are so dumb for not getting a projectile motion question right (the mean mark was 40% for that projectile motion parralel plates question). it was a surface level question yet was flagged as a hard question since the state is so stupid and can't do basic maths

 

[lucas10champ]

if ur so smart u wouldve got a band 6 but ig not