Students helping students, join us in improving Bored of Studies by donating and supporting future students!
witch hunts in europeI have the crusades
Definitely - like the study beforehand extension is harder to prepare etc, but with the exam you pretty much know what the questions are going to behonestly i think the extension history exam is easier the modern does any relate
fr i was doing a hisext paper just now and i actually had fun hahahhonestly i think the extension history exam is easier the modern does any relate
I go with two historians (Leopold von Ranke and Marc Bloch) and im not preparing an essay cause I am far too scared theyll do something like what they did with the technology questionhow do you guys approach q1? base essay or just wide knowledge? or is there a specific set of historians you usually use
went decent enough - kinda getting carried by my history project mark (90% and 76%)how did you guys go in the trial? and yeah whats your approach to studying q1 i wanna improve but i feel cooked![]()
was good! but yeah my major work was much better with 97% - i think it is way easier to do amazing in the major work cause you have time to sit with ithow did you guys go in the trial? and yeah whats your approach to studying q1 i wanna improve but i feel cooked![]()
I got 92 on the trial but only 80 on my major workhow did you guys go in the trial? and yeah whats your approach to studying q1 i wanna improve but i feel cooked![]()
Are you the only one? Still not bad marks at all especially for an extension subject - I got second for extension, BY 0.4 RAW MARKSoh my god same w the history project mark... I got 82% on my major work and awful on my trials (49% or something??) but still got first in course at my school . keep in mind I got a C in my final report card![]()
Thanks, congrats to you as well! There are only two of us lolLMAOOO no no I'm one of 9 lol.. I was literally shocked when I got the award I fr thought they were jokingcongrats on the 2nd place!! Extension is hard af
the fact that you believe it's a useless subject shows that you don't understand it at all. It's about critical thinking and understanding how political motivations guide propaganda in history.Why do people feel the need to undertake this completely useless subject
You gain nothing from this or any lead for future professions
I understand people might choose this out of personal love and curiosity but still.....you will never use these information in real world context
Unless you want to become an archaeologist - An unfortunate job (When you could earn millions from doing mining instead)
the basic skills taught in history extension of comprehension, understanding, and constructing a clear and nuanced argument is prolly one of the most universally applicable of any subjects. same with english extension. its not about the specific knowledge its about learning a method of thinkingWhy do people feel the need to undertake this completely useless subject
You gain nothing from this or any lead for future professions
I understand people might choose this out of personal love and curiosity but still.....you will never use these information in real world context
Unless you want to become an archaeologist - An unfortunate job (When you could earn millions from doing mining instead)
pretty sure that's supposed to be ragebait but like, lol you said it yourself... that's why people take the course xDI understand people might choose this out of personal love and curiosity
Thats so good congrats!the fact that you believe it's a useless subject shows that you don't understand it at all. It's about critical thinking and understanding how political motivations guide propaganda in history.
But i guess if you're an immoral bot who'd believe whatever the government tells them and prefers mining, then that's a you problem.
And by the way - I got 100% in my major work, and 48/50 in my trial.
i have talking points memorised. so like the change in audience, evidence, purpose, form and other things like the democratisation of history and the role of the digital revolution. im going to use herodotus thucydides then bede then von ranke then move into the annuals school and then modernism with carr and elton if i need really contempory ones ill pull from content areas im strong with like califorina gold rush (that was my major work). i think thats the easiest thing to do if you have a good memoryhow do you guys approach q1? base essay or just wide knowledge? or is there a specific set of historians you usually use
