Search results

I agree to a certain extent - which is why, while the thread was made with the kindest of intentions, I don't think it should be here. I think you can - you don't need to know the details of every case. Would you argue that she was right to commit suicide? Because that's what the sentence...

Yes, that's what I've argued in reverse - that just because Stalin etc. were atheist doesn't mean it was their atheism that led to their actions. They don't accept my point, so I'm taking similar atrocities committed by Christians to show how it would work both ways.

Yes, but that is a small minority of atheists. I will debate it as I will put forward my arguments on any issue, but i do not "try to save the non-believers".

http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/john_murphy/religionofhitler.html That's an exaggeration - as a rough estimae Hitler 6 million Pol Pot 2 million Mao 65 million at most Stalin 43 million That doesn't add up to 200 million - and i'm using the high estimates here. Furthermore, I would...

I think far more mass murderers were religious. Just for a starter there's Hitler Bin Laden Sadaam Hossain the IRA, the PLO and many (most?) terrorist organisations Just about anyone pre-twentieth century - eg Spanish colonialists, the crusades.

Yes - you still have a chance of 97 - especially as only one of your English Advanced units has to count. You still need to do a fair bit of work though - I'd say you need your exam marks to be better than your assessment marks.

Yes definitely - I had the nicest teachers and a really great grade.

It still only counts for two units - ie worth 20% of total aggregate for calculating UAI Also, you would be above the state average for - remeber your school is very highly ranked. Even if you are struggling with English, you are still doing advanced which will help. Your history marks are...

I disagree - I think that if they were religious they still would have committed the attrocities, just as we see in theocracies. No it isn't - just taking the definition from wikipedia and another definition

It's hard to estimate your UAI simply because you haven't really competed with students of a similar academic standard. Having said that, you probably have a good chance of getting into the 90s.

85-90

My hopes: English 85-90 Modern History 89-92 Legal Studies 93-97 (not completely sure but should be my best subject) MX1 - 94-97 MX2 - 90-93 Cosmology - have no idea Already got: Physics 92 Mathematics - 97 (obviously won't count though) SAM counted 4U Maths, English, Legal...

From when Lazaras and others got their raw marks we have the following information. 2001 - 96-97/120 = 90 2003 - 73/120 = 82 2004 - 118/120 = 99 101/120 = 93...

Yeah - that was effectively my reasoning. onebytwo's approach was probably quicker.

I reckon about 80 - the subjects you're doing scale well (apart from standard english) and your rank in MX1 suggests you're capable of doing far better in Ext. 2.

Yeah - that's my understanding of it anyway.

Sorry - just realised I called you Riviet :p

I don't think it matters if the parts of a question are out of order.

Wait a minute - we have different answers - who's right? Riviet - I think you have to divide by two as selecting AB is equivalent to selecting CD, selecting AC is equivalent to selecting BD etc.