Search results

you guize, it all depends on how strict they're marking this year

huh? are you saying it's a virus, or bacteria? and yknow what, you can't make a vaccine that fast. It takes months (probably) to make one from scratch. I just emphasised control. I did say they should kill the horses if they can't contain the illness :P (but as a last resort)

I didn't speak of the negatives either. I thought it was more focused on social impact.

I really do hope you're right. I said that because it was a virus, it was harder to treat as you can't use antibiotics. Then I focused on prevention, as opposed to treatment. Oh, bio. Please don't break my heart this year.

fuck yeah.

it's okay, i got it confused originally too. I thought A, B, and C referred to the components of the ossicles

my methods were so ridiculous. I was like... BURN EVERYTHING THAT CAME IN CONTACT WITH IT. BURN IIIIIIITTTT. Then I said it's location and transport needed to be tracked, and all those in contact with the infected horse need to be monitored. i also mentioned finding source of contagion in...

what's wrong with it? :(

not sure, but i did the cssa ones also, i didn't mention antibiotics for the horse q because it said "viral" and i thought that meant "virus" OH NO.

either epic depression for failing chem, or i'll go out :P

gurl, my teacher literally finished half of better health in a week, and then we rushed the entire communication optional the next week. then we had trials :P I personally enjoyed that module though, so I studied it properly. It was the answer?! YUUUUUUUSSSSSS.

i did a curve.... of best fit. :cry: I thought the answer was "transgenic" :( I knew macfarlane like the back of my hand tbh. it was a huge part of search for a better health. Didn't people wonder how plasma b cells replicated so quickly in response to a specific antigen? it doesn't just...

I finished the exam in about an hour and a half and then went to the toilet. Then I came back and read through everything. I think i did attempt the 2011, I thought it was okay actually

umm, i spoke of: fish: inner ear (spinal chord and swim bladder amplify noise before sending to inner ear) as well as lateral line system. insect: tympanum on the legs of insects. The hair cells vibrating on legs of grasshoppers sending chemical signals that allows interpretation. i was iffy...

This is the guy who can't carry out a proper epidemiological study here :P I mean, what genius takes a survey of less than 144 people and tries to make it a representation of a population?

I think i got a few wrong in MC, and idk. I could answer all the questions, but yknow when you're iffy about whether you're actually answering the question? That's how i felt. i felt it was too...simple and that I was forgetting so much or misinterpreting the question. i cant remember if i even...

It did ask for two :( but i put three incase one of them was wrong. SURELY THEY CANT MARK YOU DOWN FOR DOING MORE THAN ASKED?! :(

I don't even think I got 70 raw :( so sad :cry: i bombed it in hindsight. sigh. And I know my shit too!

psh, so he can screw all our marks too? :P imagine that. He's in charge of aligning, and uses james ruse as the standards for the rest of us (Similarly to how he only did the survey for a particular office)

- he used some features of an epidemiological report, but it wasn't reliable, consistent, or accurate. - small sample size - didn't survey other demographics i.e. age, occupation, location - he removed some people from the report, reducing the half female/half male control - didn't consolidate...