Search results

send him back to uni! lrn2epidemiology/10 :P

what causes mutation during mitosis? it's an exact copy, isn't it? :/

ahaha :') i can't actually remember if i used a general neutral term of though. I didn't mention the scientist in particular that many times, rather how much I thought he was wrong and he should quit his job :P

3 exams down, 5 more to go!

i'm pretty sure it's transgenic species. otherwise it would've had "recombinant dna" if they wanted the process

I referred to the scientist as "the scientist", i'm just assuming it's a guy on here because a girl wouldn't overlook such details ;)

I wasn't too sure about the eyes and purpose, so i put three animals. The snake and it's need for infra-red to detect heat from prey the bee and compound eye with ommotodia because it needs to see things really fast as it flies. As well as ultraviolet because of the flowers planatarian (i...

ahahahaha. strong scientist, he is :P I did say he maintained some features of an epidemiological study, but not all things were considered. Plus the fact that he saw if they had a health check, but didn't elaborate on it. It might have been like: "have you had a health check in the last...

i said what the study was hoping to achieve, and how the small sample size + small demographic didn't depict a complete representation of the population. the question was about his methodology, i didn't think it was asking for advantages/disadvantages (by my interpretation anyway) i based it...

but then the gender ratio is screwed up yeah, i thought this during the exam idk guize :(

i also questioned the relevance of the questions asked, and the fact he took some people out. It screwed up the male/female ratio by taking it out

I fucking ripped him. Not valid, reliable or consistent at all.

all I can say is wtf for the plant cooling one. Did you guys put down that it closes stomata to retain water? I know transpirawtion will cool it down, but tehn it'll die D:

but that's the whole point of natural selection. There isn't supposed to be an equal chance of survival?

:( oh no :cry:

yep THAT WAS SO TROLL. I looked at it twice, and I didn't realise until i thought to myself, wtf the anvil doesn't do THAT much for them to base 2 marks on it. Hopefully people realised too.

I thought it referred to recording the focal length required for a clear image to be formed on the retina. But wtf was that question about the inherited/recessive/sex linked mother? i was so lost. and i spent way too much time trying to figure out that enzyme activity graph.

Was I the only one who finished really early? I finished the exam at like 11:15, and we started at 9:35 I went to the bathroom to pee and then spent my time going through my answers. It's very messy though. I wish I paced myself more

I wrote about the clonal selection theory, and how it provided an understanding of immunity.

I nearly died when i realised that B was the ossicles. I thought A, B and C were the components of the ossicles. Thank god i realised last minute.