Search results

As far as I know, yes that is right.

There was no table to be drawn, from my recollection. There was the tree diagram, but that wasn't hard at all, just filling in values. The graph was a straight line to a certain point, then it went upward.

Well the amount that it costs is $22, which is 110% of the original price. Timse that by 100, then divide by 110, and you get the original price, which is 20. Then just do 22-20. :). You must have done something like 22 * 10 / 100, which would equal 2.2. Hope that helped.

Q5 MC - Cannot be D, as diagram I is the stock standard net for a triangular pyramid. Q6 MC - Already prooven wrong. Q9 MC - I think this is a very bad question. None of them are necessarily right, as the population of a city means little to how many schools it has - it is the number of...

You had to do two applications of Simpsons rule for the question - then all you had to do was double that, as it was the same on the other side. It was a few THOUSAND less than the total SA as well. That 2 was in METRES, not cm. That caught me at first, till I realised it was metres. No way it...

Ouch. It wasn't easy, but I didn't think it was that hard :S.

Probability of a weighted coin showing heads if 3/4.

I am apparently on 83/100. Apparently. How did you all measure up?

I did Speer and argued that he did not shape events, that he was shaped by them - rather passive when it came to everything, didn't exert any outward influence to try and do things (Except the scorched earth thing, he stopped that on his own accord - to save his arse from the allies).

Which question did everyone here do? I did the one about turning points. I argued that Operation Barbarossa wasnt THE turning point, just a turning point - Without the Battle of Britain and the North African campaign, it wouldn't have been as major as it was. What question did you do, and how...

I did the cultural question. I split it into what happened 1923-33 and 1933-39, then did a paragraph on why it changed. I thought that was the best way to do it. I wasn't 100% sure on that foreign policy question, although I knew I could have rambled on about it. 6 pages, roughly.

Last year at my school they had to do gendered language (Which is where I think that Jane Austen fits in). I think they changed after the protest by students at having to watch Brokeback Mountain :rofl: :santa:

I didn't say he was a Jew, I said he was a jew lover. Big difference. Not to mention that the Jew's are pissed because they didn't get the East Bank too, and Truman stated that they were the most arrogant of all the POW's they had to deal with.

So 63/105, or 60/100. Your school mark would be scaled up to whatever the 8th best mark in the exam was, and you would keep your HSC mark. Thats my understanding of it anyway - I can't factor in amount of people, the rank of your school, etc.

In this section I said that the intense relationship was simply to show issues about our own humanity, and how it would lead to suffering. Talked about anger, suffering, and devoted another paragraph to the structure of the play, the catharsis, etc. Always went back to the human condition and...

As it was a comparative study of texts, I compared and contrasted. Said that they both showed the destruction of the natural world, but highlighted the effects different in regards to: nature and the individual. Pulled it off in six and a bit pages.

I think ive done moderatly well, actually. Sorry to spoil the party.

We do speculative fiction. I honestly think we did more work last year to get marks no where near as good as what we do this year. Extension rules :)

Yes Koko, English is over for some. I still have Extension English, which is 100X more fun and 10X easier to do. Only one module, thats it. One essay, one creative --> In the time we had for the Journeys essay.

Paper<3 Kilometrico <3