Search results

Wtf? Your introductory post for a wimbledon thread made no mention of last year's mens singles finalists? You know nothing.

Ooohhhh SNAP!

Half of the retards that post topics in this forum have that same problem. Just check out some of the threads here.:)

I'm sure you have a credit average. You keep telling yourself that little Musk. I don't need to spend hours watching you to notice the fact that you're severely lacking in even the most basic english language skills. I mean your lack of ability to express yourself properly is evident is...

No, it's failure. You're doing great at life? Well if an unintelligent failure like you has a great life, there's hope for everyone. Oh btw, you mean 'have you even 'had/obtained' a job before.' I'd tell you but then you'd just turn around and not believe me so what's the point? Besides, I don't...

Wow Musk that must be the first post you've produced where you haven't used shit or fuck or cunt to hide the fact that you can't express yourself properly, so you do deserve a medal. BTW, don't overuse the word 'regards', it makes your dyslexia even more apparent. So you're only online...

Musk I forgot about your downs. So to avoid confusing you next time I'll quote his post even though it was obvious that I was referring to what he said. So Musk tell me how it's like not being able to express yourself without saying something along the lines of fuck shit cunt bogan. You're like...

Do you understand the relation of my previous reply to jumb's post? Oh sorry I forgot, having an understanding of anything isn't exactly an attribute of yours.

UT99? I didn't think anyone here played it.

Edit: Decided to remove arguments. I will draw you guys into an argument when I have time for it.

Perhaps you were lucky and had some good teachers? But I would find it very hard to believe that most teachers are like that. A good teacher isn't simply one who is liked by their students - that is the bare minimum and is really the sole basis upon which teachers are selected (in general). A...

It depends on your goals and abilities and no 'post-HSC' is not necessarily a lot more stressful than the HSC itself. When you're in uni, for most courses, you only need mediocre marks to get a job - with the HSC you need good marks to get into most courses which are worth doing. That is the...

I'm sure a year 10 student could fit in perfectly well into a law course. The subjects I've topped don't rely on internet typing skills. Perhaps if you didn't spend hours making sure that every single word you typed was correct, you'd actually start getting decent marks. You're the type of...

There is no absolute interpretation behind the intent of a comment made on an internet forum. Need I remind you that there is no face to face contact? It's very convenient for you to say that something's a joke when you have the benefit of hindsight isn't it? The very fact that you ask for a...

Yes you don't have any aptitude for law. This is obvious from the fact that you couldn't even read what I said porperly. I was referring to your flawed logic that you can infer your final mark from assessments which form a very small proportion of your grade. I mean "Actually I received full...

Do multiple choice quizzes form the majority of your assessment? No? What next? You received full marks for an assignment worth 5% of your total assesment so you conclude that your final mark for the subject will necessarily be the same? Moron. The fact that you have no aptitude for law has...

Economics and law subjects are not objectively marked moron. UWS subjects have harder assessments? Yeah sure: http://library.uws.edu.au/FILES/exams/spring2004/200196%20(Final).pdf (3 hours writing time, far easier questions which require little to no thought)...

I'm sure that you also know someone who failed high school science and went on to receive the nobel prize for physics. These specific examples mean nothing. Why don't you compare assessments, across different unis, for subjects which aren't subjectively marked. You'll see a clear difference...

Standardised marks, less competition = you're a failure if you don't get excellent marks in a low competition environment.

Generally speaking if you've got the right secondary schooling background (ie. you actually did something in high school) and you have any sort of aptitude in the area that you're studying, a credit average is a foregone conclusion. You just have to do a reasonable amount of study.