Search results

Sorry, I can't understand you. Speak properly.

yeah but, you're asian

I'm pretty smart. c.f sig

Re: Semester 1 Chatter Thread mrr so how about that uni werk guys?

Re: Semester 1 Chatter Thread mrr so how about that uni werk guys?

happiness: done mind: boo :( bump

lol dude, sex has a baby clause in it. You go around that by using protection. You can't just pretend like it's doesn't lead to that just because you don't want it to. If you don't want a baby then use protection or don't have sex. edit: re dom

should've covered your cock then eh?

i have <500 words woo doing well. i want another 500 before i go to class... and then >500 tonight.

Re: Semester 1 Chatter Thread lol zoe

Re: Semester 1 Chatter Thread lol zoe

sounds like a plan. I just hope I don't then miss an important distinction, but meh

in this context it is confusing, because often pleasure, enjoyment, happiness are all used interchangeably. Other times it's important to distinguish between them. But when you're using old texts the meaning of the words has been altered slightly (so aristotle mightbe using it in the same way as...

In a lot of the texts (like aristotle's and the encyc) they use the phrase 'pleasure is intrinsically good' - I am taking that as a synonym for happiness. That shouldn't be a problem right. I'm pretty sure that's how they mean it but i don't know whether i need to put a qualifying phrase about...

yeah monday i seriously want to take the extra day or something, but I won't work on it thurs night.. and i want to get it over with. you started ben?

someone come online and talk to me about my essay :\

I'd either do the first or the last, but that's because i know next to nothing about the others. is moral good? I know someone who's doing moral and happiness and say they overlap a lot so I don't know if it's worth doing it later. re ben: it better not be :\ I thought it was...

did you talk at all?

Re: Cost of premixes to be upped by $15 a case back in my day we drank goon and pop, that's where they should be targeting. furthermore, cunts.

on another note, do you reckon I can reference stanford encyc. of phil?