Search results

i'm doing property law and though it is technical i wouldn't say it's difficult. i have heard that evidence is quite challenging - at the uni i go to it is not recommended to be taken until your final year.

ok, i was only kidding, on a more serious note: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttNZsSUvKXM&feature=related.

so long as you see yourself in this position, then it's pretty smooth sailing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBeiKpAGXzc.

its orgasmic nature. those that have read Hart's 'concept of law' will attest to this.

ok so random thought, if a judge wants to sue someone, would they hire a lawyer or would they represent themselves and quote themselves as authority? in a similar vein, when Kirby J retires can he go back to being a barrister and if so will he just quote himself as authority and tell whichever...

when i worked at a clc everyone wore casual attire and so one day i decided to rock up in denim shorts, t-shirt, and beach thongs - it's not like the clients on the phone could see me!

hey i'm in qld as well but not the same uni you go to seeing that my lecturer was not a fat lesbian bitch. my tip would be: in your exam use words like 'iniquitous', 'consequentialism', 'the pitfall of antiquarianism', 'herculean judge', 'natural rights is nonsense upon stilts', 'the open...

i guess it's because, with a lot of universities, they teach everything you need to know about legal research (i.e. how to use westlaw, lexis nexis etc) during the first few weeks of law school in a single library session, after which most of the students just do a brain dump since it's not like...

freedom of political communication eh?? so i guess the question is whether gagging people is a measure that is reasonably appropriate and adapted to achieving the objective of maintaining peace and order. hmm food for thought.

congrats! i told you the barrister's wig would work. genius eh?

the conclusion of every glorious moot should be celebrated by getting together with all your learned friends and having a massive orgy in the moot court. hot judges are also to participate: brings new meaning to "may it please your honour" and "submitting" to the court.

i hate law students who talk like lawyers no matter where they are - be it at the cafe, in the law library, or at the law ball - these type of law students are in 'lawyer mode' all the time with such an artificial personality it just makes me wanna kick em in the ass - especially when they give...

now that should be the litmus test for unconscionability

sure dude, you'd actually be surprised that a lot of law students, myself included, came from a maths/science background (physics chem adv maths etc) and therefore had quite mediocre writing ability. in fact, doing physics and chem helped me a lot with law. a lot of people i know who are doing...

you should wear a barrister's wig to show your eagerness to enter the legal profession.

so what is the ratio of D v S? i never read D v S and now that I've got an ambulance chasing moot to focus on after i'm done with exams, it looks like i'll have to read the case! did lord atkin just plagiarise the bible in formulating the neighbour principle? how did the neighbour principle...

question: if you've been selected for a spot in an external moot team (one which is not as schmick as jessup), does this give you a good chance of getting a clerkship even if your marks are plain average?

that is true. i thought it was absolute rubbish. until i picked up a law report and the landmark case i was looking for had been torn out. there were scathing messages of insult on the adjacent pages to whoever was responsible. it's just unconscionable.

The answer lies in the lyrics to "Black or White" by Michael Jackson.

Jerry Espensen: yuck yuck yuck yuck yuck!